But the point is it's a fantasy for men. Not women, men. I don't think women find it empowering to be resigned to the background in so much popular culture, with tits and ass on display as much as possible. Croft may have some female fans though designed with a male audience in mind - but are those female fans there (assuming they still are) because she's a sex object for men or because she's one of a still very small number of female heroines in video games?
In a lot of popular fiction men get to be muscular, well armed, maybe with a face full of gnarly scars and deep in the action. Women get to walk around looking like a stripper in impractical costumes with immaculate makeup, usually in the background. It's not empowerment - if it was, the men would be probably prancing around in speedos & hotpants with hairless skinny bodies and genitals on proud display at every possible moment.
The costumes in the recent Batman games are a good example of this: If a waif Batman ran about half-unzipped like Catwoman, would men still want to play the game? Would they still admire the character? How about the Joker standing with hips cocked in Harley's revealing fetish gear? Or even Ivy's crotch plate? What if Batman dressed revealingly but was one of a small number of male heroes in comics & video games? Would that make it more or less tolerable for male comic and game fans?