I'm sure there would be a lot of added features as well, as the hardware would allow a much bigger game. Just because you can't think of anything, doesn't mean others can't.
As @kav82 said, you can still have a portable version alongside a home console version if you really must insist on going outside to meet your friends and battle. Though outside of Japan and children how often does this actually happen?
And if they didn't have a portable version a companion app for trading would work. Maybe not battling but I imagine most of that would be done online anyway.
Yeah. He's normally off on one about how Nintendo diversify gaming, etc. But nope. Pokemon should remain exactly the same forever. (Unless it's a spin off of course).
I guess, for me, it's just a bit sad/annoying that we don't get Star Fox games very often and the fact I hate motion controls means I have wait even longer for one I can enjoy.
Ah well, Battlefront's Fighter Squadron mode will keep me going 'til No Man's Sky.
I've never used the portable aspect. Well, maybe a couple of times as a kid. Hate small-screen gaming these days anyway.
A big open-world Pokemon would be great, I'm sure many others agree. Any pluses to the portable aspect could be solved with the Internet and, dare I say it, voice chat.
Using the touchpad is hardly the same as flailing your arms around with a wiimote or getting backache because you're trying to twist a GamePad around in an uncomfortable position.
Yeah motion controls are new or innovative. They're old hat and annoying.
I won't pick this up until I hear from the people who hate motion controls what it's like. I actually did want a Star Fox that just controlled the same. The original control scheme wasn't broken.
The PS4 games are definitely already up, but you have to search for them on the store individually. They're not up on the PS+ area yet:
Dead Star, PS4
Zombi, PS4
I Am Alive, PS3
Savage Moon, PS3
Shutshimi, PS Vita
A Virus Named Tom, PS Vita
Well they already are making more movies, no one suggested they'd rather have a TV series. And saying a TV show wouldn't have the "heart" of Star Wars is preposterous as you've no proof either way what it would be like.
And although I don't have a breakdown of exactly what that $200 million was spent on (and nor can I be bothered to look for one) it's safe to assume they'd manage to save quite a bit of money by reusing sets, paying actors less (I would assume it'd be a brand new cast that wouldn't get paid as much by far - with original actors showing up for cameos/guest appearances) and they'd have to be pickier/clever with the locations they picked. Game of Thrones is a good example of filming in exotic locations on a budget.
I need to trample 15 people with an AT-ST. I can rarely even find the pick-up and when I do I'm so overjoyed I normally run straight into oncoming fire and explode within a minute.
Yeah, as someone who loves the films but never read up on anything else - I always just assumed they were great friends, not that there was a life debt in place.
And also, Leia was never that nice to Chewbacca in the films. Not saying they couldn't have formed a bond in the interim of course.