DiemetriX Posted June 23, 2006 Author Posted June 23, 2006 A device or something that gives me privacy and allows me to watch porn etc in public places. wait.. some one beat me to it :P
The fish Posted June 23, 2006 Posted June 23, 2006 Heated toilet seat That is fucking genius.:bowdown: Stupid idea: There are no cakes that incorpirate the great taste of lard. Therefore I propose a lard flavour cake. (I'm joking, by the way) Clever idea: I have an idea for a totaly, totaly instant communication device. It would be all but useless here on earth when you wish to talk to somone else on earth. However, for communication through space, which light (and therefore radiowaves) take a while to travel through due to the fucking massive distances involved, this would be perfect. It works by through sister particles. Wtf:wtf::wtf:, you say. The first, and hardest, step is to seperate two particles (or more, for communicating with multiple people with one device) from the same nucleus. This is done by using fuck-loads of energy, and then you contain them seperatly and in a vacum, using a large amount of lead (mmm...lead...) and a vacum pump. Now for the communication part: Send one particle to, let's say, Mars. Keep the other one here. Using an electromagnet, or some other means, you move one of the particles in one direction, and the sister particle will do the exact opposite. Instantly. This could be used to send a digital signal (as it is always "on" or "off") very, very quickly across massive distances. Glasses with a HUD on them...I'd have mine with crosshairs n stuff. This is possible. Simply have a laser going down the firearm's sight, which is then wirelessly transmitted to the glasses. They then calculate the relative position of the weapon, and which direction they are pointing. You could just get a red-dot lasersight, though... Oh, and who ever came up with the idea of the windtubines with solar panels on broad blades should follow that up. It is a bloody good idea.
triforcemario Posted June 23, 2006 Posted June 23, 2006 I would copyright a new sport i´ve been thinking about.Fire Tennis! It´s like normal tennis but with the tennis ball on fire! I´m gonna try it one day You sir, are a genius.
Pizza Posted June 24, 2006 Posted June 24, 2006 Send one particle to, let's say, Mars. Keep the other one here.Using an electromagnet, or some other means, you move one of the particles in one direction, and the sister particle will do the exact opposite. Instantly. Out of curiosity, why aren't the particles affected by moving one of them to mars? How is any of this supposed to work? My idea- superhero conversion kit. Consists of miniaturised kangaroo boots (these are the things that let even fat people frontflip over the world highjump record), a cape, gloves and shoes that stick to most surfaces, such as the sides of buildings and a posing pouch.
The fish Posted June 24, 2006 Posted June 24, 2006 Out of curiosity, why aren't the particles affected by moving one of them to mars? How is any of this supposed to work? I explained that in the most basic understandable terms, I could explain it in more depth, but it would be very very complex. They would be affected, but until whoever you are sending it with got there, don't bother listening to anything they sent, as it would be a constant signal that would be the same. It would work, trust me.
Pizza Posted June 25, 2006 Posted June 25, 2006 I only ask as what you are mentioning seems to be possible right now- breaking particles from a nucleus happens all the time, particle accelerators can presumably handle it, vacuums are available and lead...well everyone has some lead. If you just happen to be some physics boff with a PHD, then I'll leave it.
Recommended Posts