old_gregg Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 No. There isn't any here so slow down with that locking Moderaters. What are your thoughts on this, do you think it should be banned or do you like a little bit of three year old pussie every now and again. Personally I think it is sick but I over heard this conversation on the back of the Bus the other day where these young lads were quite openly talkin about likein it and wandered whether anyone else felt the same????
dabookerman Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 No. There isn't any here so slow down with that locking Moderaters. What are your thoughts on this, do you think it should be banned or do you like a little bit of three year old pussie every now and again. Personally I think it is sick but I over heard this conversation on the back of the Bus the other day where these young lads were quite openly talkin about likein it and wandered whether anyone else felt the same???? banned...with a capital B....child porn is as bad as beastiality and feases porn. its nasty...yuck
Mr_Odwin Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 There's no discussion on this. It's just wrong.
mike-zim Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 it is sick and wrong. people who do this sort of thing should get the death sentance
Dawn Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 Agreed - there is no discussion, it is clearly and unconditionally wrong.
Cubechris Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 As Odwin said, there should be no disputes on this, as yes it very wrong. I should hope that who ever posts in this thread has the same opinion.
old_gregg Posted November 9, 2005 Author Posted November 9, 2005 Glad to see that I'm not the only one who thinks this pratice is sicker than a Cat on vasaline.
dabookerman Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 Glad to see that I'm not the only one who thinks this pratice is sicker than a Cat on vasaline. and you thought people on these boards were into it!?
old_gregg Posted November 9, 2005 Author Posted November 9, 2005 Hey heres a question for you. What do you see Child Porn as? I mean for example in Japen they get little girls (about 8 or 9) to dress up as Manga characters, and don't leave much to the imagination etiher, and then Old men get there photos taken with them often in compriseing positions. That is entirely normal in Japen yet is that not a form of Child abuse as well?
Cubechris Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 I think everybody is going to have simialr replies, so Im thinking there isn't much to discuss here, so this thread can't really have much direction...
old_gregg Posted November 9, 2005 Author Posted November 9, 2005 and you thought people on these boards were into it!? No, no, no. If you had read the Post you would know that I wasent refering to you guys just what I had heard on the Bus. You see it is hardley a topic you bring up in real life conversation so i had never really heard anyone elses views (other than the media's) on it until then so as most of you on this site are of the same age i just wanted to know whether or not it was just me who found this sick. Well i blame myself for picking such a controversial topic and thread name
Shorty Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 This is it. I thought emotion threads were bad. We all moaned about milestones. Posting a piece of flash as old as the internet itself got tedious. But now we've really hit rock bottom. If I had my way you'd be banned for starting this discussion and this thread would be long gone.
dabookerman Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 give the guy a chance (or are we just joking) child porn = child abuse, = nasty; { people who look at it = mentally deranged sick fucks; japanese people = different to western people } there
mike-zim Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 This is it. I thought emotion threads were bad. We all moaned about milestones. Posting a piece of flash as old as the internet itself got tedious. But now we've really hit rock bottom. If I had my way you'd be banned for starting this discussion and this thread would be long gone. i disagree with you totally. what ever happened to freedom of speech? it is not like the guy is promoting it. i think he should be commended for having the balls to post it. I still say its wrong.
old_gregg Posted November 9, 2005 Author Posted November 9, 2005 This is it. I thought emotion threads were bad. We all moaned about milestones. Posting a piece of flash as old as the internet itself got tedious. But now we've really hit rock bottom. If I had my way you'd be banned for starting this discussion and this thread would be long gone. Well arent you a Feisty one. I know its a bit controversial but that doesent make it any less of a relevent thread then say...welll take your pick. Ban Me, go ahead if you really feel that strongly about it but at the end of the day you've got a problem talking about soething that is really happening, i was asking for your views on it not me and if you think that by posting this thread it makes me bad, well i'm sorry but that is just idioctic cos at the end of the day at least I had the balls to talk about it where as if it was up to you we would just brush it under the already full social carpet and that would be more wrong then any amount of talking about it could ever be. Edit: Thanks Mike-zim, i was actually writeing this thread whislt you posted yours so i apologise for some of the similar wording.
Shorty Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 I'm sorry this is just not something that I would deem discussion worthy. I used to come on these boards solely to talk about movies, take part in funny competitions and argue over bands. Those things were fun! Where's the fun in asking whether anyone here likes child porn. I'm sorry the whole topic just makes me sick. I'd expect anyone who looks at it to get locked up for the rest of their life, and anyone who takes the pictures or abuses children in any such way to be... well executed preferably. I never said the thread should go because it was irrelevant, just because the topic is disgusting. Incidentally freedom of speech is a myth. Edit: And what the hell are you talking about "had the balls to post it". It doesn't exactly take mountains of courage to post a topic about anything whatsoever under a pseudonym on an internet message board. If I made a thread about selling children crack or running over puppies I don't think it would make me a hero.
Pestneb Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 I'm guessing a)the guys were saying it hoping for a reaction, at which point they'd claim the person reacting had misheard them and... wait a second, what are you doing thinking of child porn sicko? b)you misheard them - in which case why were you thinking of child porn sicko? c)you misunderstood the conversation d)they are paedophiles. most people socially know thats wrong, much like homosexuality used to be, as such they won't speak of it. It wouldn't surprise me if in a few decades time beastiality and/or paedophilia were as accepted as homosexuality is now. basically, at the moment you have young children openly having sex (open to the extent it is spoken about in the press, technically not even teens (12 and under) getting pregnant) next stage will be some point around 2015-2025 at that stage underage sex would be pretty much acceptable, and you will start getting young, but adult, people having sex with younger (under 16) people. this will be covered in the press. around 2025-2050 young adults having sex with under 16's will be so common the law will be completly ignored on the issue, if indeed it hasn't been removed. around 2040-2080 paedophilia will be totally acceptable. I may be way off on that, but thats the way I see it. It won't be seen as abuse, but recognising the childs rights to experience sex, which everyone will agree is one of the most wonderful and intimate things humans can share with one another. just so long as the kiddies are taught how to use condoms. To answer the thread I find women (in general) who are a couple of years younger than me uninteresting, generally only find women remotely interesting (in that way) if they are within a half decade of my age.
gaggle64 Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 Definitly no kiddie porn. It's just wrong - wrong, wrong and wrong. As in, totally sick. Although I personally feel we really need to put some serious research into stuff like peadophilia, to find out how this stuff ever gets started, and if it is something we can treat or something.
system_error Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 I think that the abuse of children wether it is physically or in any other form justifies the reestablishing of capital punishment. After all the majority of convicted child molesters do it again after they have been released. So to ensure the future of us (after all I might have children once too)a those people should be banned - banned from life. Don't get me wrong I am not a fan of the death penalty and in general I believe every human has the right to live but some actions can not be tolerated. Those people give up their granted right in my eyes.
dukkadukka Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 It wouldn't surprise me if in a few decades time beastiality and/or paedophilia were as accepted as homosexuality is now. it's pretty disgusting for you to make any association between homosexuality and paedophilia. the acceptance of gay people has nothing to do with the moral degradation of modern society, and i'm angry that you'd make such an ignorant comment.
Mr_Odwin Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 It's something that was once seen as morally wrong and is now accepted; it falls in line with the rest of his post fine.
Dawn Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 Interesting points pestneb - I think that some of your comments need some context though - when you say that sex for kiddies is ok if they know how to use condoms, are you thinking that 2 13 year olds experimenting and getting it on is ok as long as they use condoms? Im guessing you are, in which case yes, I agree, the bit where it gets all wrong is when its abuse, when there is an abuse of power where someone older takes advantage of a younger person who is either powerless physically or not strong enough mentally/emtionally to say no or even appreciate the wrongness of the act. People should be left innocent for as long as they can be, and if they do want to have a sexual expereince before they are legally meant to do so, it should be with someone of a similar age who is also consenting and it should be done without ignorance of what they are doing.
dukkadukka Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 it's his implication that the acceptance of homosexuality is a negative thing that i have a problem with. i understand that as a mormon you will have different views to me on this, but i found his post pretty offensive. that is all.
Shino Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 This is not a debatable issue, much like you dont ask if killing people is right or wrong, it's just wrong. child porn = child abuse, = nasty; { people who look at it = mentally deranged sick fucks; japanese people = different to western people } So you think that japanese people have the right to do it, just because they're culturaly diferente from us?
mike-zim Posted November 9, 2005 Posted November 9, 2005 After all the majority of convicted child molesters do it again after they have been released. i agree. the problem is that the government are too soft. i am not just talking on topic. they are too soft on every serious crime, rape, murder, armed robery, robery in general and the afor mentioned child abuse. but they instead punish law abiding citizens who refuse to pay inflated council tax prices. spend millions of pound on pointless art ( which will get vandalised anyway). The problem is that no one will do anything about it. It really annoys me.
Recommended Posts