I'm repeating that I feel his punishment is just because I feel it is just, regardless of precisely how his brain works. I believe it to function well enough for him to have known that taking life is wrong which is why I believe it's a just punishment.
I don't care to try and counter anything I see as not a noteworthy point.
What's your point in striking up the conversation? I was simply stating that I thought his punishment was just given what I'd read and from what I felt from that. I was asked about thing to which I replied, I'm not here to debate, I'm here to simply give my view.