Nolan

ergo? ipso facto? Anyways, I agree William H. Macy is made of win. Sam Neill isn't too bad either.

6ms is plenty fast, response times aren't the main issue, it's refresh rates.....or was I think most LCDs refresh plenty fast now. Even when they don't it's pixelation and not bluring. Is it in-game motion blur that you perhaps never noticed before going HD? Blur has become very very common in most games.

Well, tonight me and a few mates went to a Hookah Bar. It was pretty cool actually, except during my first hit someone made me laugh which caused much coughing. For those that don't know what a Hookah is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hookah Oh, and / nando / talking about a mouse reminds me that, a humane mouse trap is not humane in the winter....

The Princess Bride It has everything but the sci-fi. 10/10

Only ever played Meteos(didn't care for) and E4(Love unconditionally). I'll have to keep an eye on this. Oh and iirc E3/E4 are based off of a free downloadable game called Every Extend, idk that Mizuguchi is the actual creator, so much as he furthered the series beyond it's simple origins.

D: Those crazy people, I put subtitles on whenever I can, english or not.

You can always try the alternative Of course, idk anything about their shipping, you'd probably have to try and find a more local similar site.

Morel Orel A overinterpretation of the bible by a youth. This particular episode was about removing all pleasure from his life to show devotion to God. In doing so he found that devotion to god gave him pleasure(wet dreams), so he became a masochist. Need I say more? 8/10, The show is hilarious but only 15 minutes long

ahhh. Interesting, here in the US analog will be done in Febuary 09. Right now they're pushing people to get converter boxes to change an analog signal into digital so that antennas and whatnot still work. Right now we can get HD channels over the antenna even. Thanks though.

White is probably considered to be a more distracting color than black, silver, even red. I don't I've ever really seen a white TV to be truthful. Oh and that TV isn't really out of date, it's just not 1080p is all, everything else seems normal. I have a quick question of my own, what exactly is freeview?

Yes, both! And Cathod Ray Tubes.

Everyone remember though, CRTs did it first

I'm a bit late to this thread, but oh well. Quick bit about contrast ratios for future knowledge. A contrast ratio is basically just the difference from the whitest white to the blackest black. There are two kinds of CR also, Static Contrast Ratio and Dynamic Contrast Ratio. SCR is what a TV can display at any one time, while DCR is more of a simulated experience. A DCR of 1K:1 is close to 2500:1. Newer Samsungs and Plasma TVs are now displaying 1M:1 DCR, and for the last few years Plasmas had much better CRs than even an LCDs DCR. None of that really matters though since you've already made a choice. Besides, think of it this way the majority of PC Monitors only have a CR of around 600-1000:1 if your lucky some go higher.

Not much. I wouldn't use a monitor as a TV even if it is better, due to some monitors lacking HDCP(I think that's that acronym I want) and a 50" TV from 6 feet away the differences are negligible. A HDTV used as a monitor though is just bleh there are no advantages that I can see you might get a lower price, and an inferior picture.

http://www.ebuyer.com/product/151430 Cheapest 24" I saw, but I wouldn't trust it at all. I don't know about the brand is all. http://www.ebuyer.com/product/135253 The next cheapest is this Dell, and even if their PCs and Laptops are iffy, Dell does make good Monitors. Of course for about 60 more there is a 28" ViewSonic. My personal experience with a Viewsonic isn't particularly noteworthy, I've never had any trouble with it the picture was fine never noticed backlight bleed or dead pixels. http://www.ebuyer.com/product/141998 And now here's me acting like a douche. It's with PC monitors, size doesn't matter as much as with a HDTV. the difference between a 22" and a 24" monitor is 1680x1050 and 1920x1200(assuming 19:10 instead of 16:9) respectively. If you want to go 2560x1600 you need to go to a 30" monitor, the 6" between 1920x1200 and 2560x1600 really aren't as big of a difference as the change in resolution. If you look hard enough(and their becoming more common) you can find 19"@1680x1050. With a bit of scrounging there are 22" and 23" monitors to be had at 1920x1080 22" Viewsonic 166 23" Dell 191 I'd personally save some money and go for the 22" Viewsonic at a very respectable resolution. EDIT: Raining Again, monitor(ANY monitor even CRTs(technically better than most LCDs..))>>>>>(Any)TV.

I guess that one isn't too bad, but the Intel Graphics are worse than a 5 year old card. I'm not sure about the CPU, but I think it's a Pentium D.....which you'd do good to stay away from. They do claim that the motherboard will accept a Core 2 Duo. If you were to pick that up, I'd suggest a new CPU to go with the GPU also.

<_< >_> <_< *Hasn't seen Citizen Kane, or been spoiled*

According to 1up.com only 9 games in the magazines 22 year history. In this same issue though they gave Fallout 3 a 38/40 which is the highest for a western RPG.

Nintendo has already released a large portion of their AAA catalog, do you really expect a Zelda every 2 years? If so your the only one. It's not soley Nintendos fault that your left unhappy, 3rd parties are also on the Wii, most are sadly shovelware, but there undoubtably good games by the 3rd parties. Just less of whats on the other consoles.

Windows 7 (official name) is coming at the end of 09. At least that's what they're shooting for atm.

He's going to use it for his 360 rather than a PC.

Actually I posted a 4830, which isn't bad at all. You are mostly correct though, Haded you should stay away from cards like the 8400/9400/3400/4400. They are low end cards, they could only give acceptable preformance in Steam games. Maybe Fallout 3, and I'm doubtful of Red Alert 3 and Total War(unless you mean the old games not the new one.) Idk why my links didn't work for you, I just copy pastes the addresses into the insert URL. I just tried them and they worked. A 9600GT will do just fine for you.

I don't think there will be that much of a difference(visually), either way the games native output is smaller than their resolutions. Screen size really is up to you, I know someone using a 15" monitor at 1024x768, me personally I won't go below 17" as a PC monitor. I will say though, if your going to be more than 2-3 feet away from the monitor, bigger is better.

Need to know the resolution to tell if there is a subtantial difference. I'm guessing that one is 1440x900 and the 22" is most likely 1680x1050. Both of those resolutions are 16:10 aspects, so if you run your 360 at the LCDs native resolution(best picture quality rather than a slightly lower one.) you'll have small black bars at the top and bottom since games are rarely, if at all, anything but 16:9.

EPIC READ! I skimmed about 1/3 of it then skimmed the comments. All I'm going to say is in the last 2 years Nintendo has consistently put out games from launch to today. Most of the games are good, some of them can appeal to any player(MK/AC for example), some to the "core" (MP3 SPM), then the gimmicks (Wii*insert suffix here*) Some quick numbers, since 2006 Nintendo has published 26 titles(not including japan only titles.) Sony enjoys the same number of titles published. Microsoft has published 31 titles, or 28 if you don't count 2005. Most of sonys titles were sports(bleh) at that. They're not doing anyless than the other companies, they're just spreading their target audience more. Besides, they blew their load early on, do you really think we'll get another Zelda after 2 years? or MP? The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence.