Sméagol

Me or Jonnas? I believe I protect from everything. At least my role PM says no one can get to my target.

I can imagine, just like ReZ obviously is disappointed, but it’s no fun playing in games where activity is faltering anyway, so you’re better off. During the holiday season, activity always falters, I have observed.

Ehm, some screw-ups on both your and my account.. Your screw-up: I’m mr. Tickle. My screw-up: I must admit I’m still cruising on the role list floating in this thread, and still haven’t kept any notes.. I was totally unaware you're are a protector. However. I did not target you.. I targeted mr. Topsy Turvy again. So that would mean Eevil has some explaining to do, unless he’s going to use the excuse I just provided for him.. And while I’m at it, let me just explicitly claim jailkeeper. I’d be looking at Eevil and Diageo. I suggest going after Eevil first.. Actually just vote: Mr. Funny

My game will start exactly when it’s appropriate. Sing-ups will start the 23rd. Perhaps a little break is a good thing?

Although unnecessary, I’ll add my vote (before I go): vote: Mr. Lazy I stopped Mr. Grumpy.

Requiem for a dream [A great list]

Which other day? This is the first mafia he finds.. Isn’t it?

Actually, how do you know you were roleblocked by Mr. Lazy specifically ReZ? You just got a name in your PM?

While it’s true that you being a roleblocker means nothing, you’re original role, well basically also means nothing, which means you’re not confirmed anything. So this deflection is a red flag to me actually. ReZ, how were you roleblocked? Just to complete the picture.. vote: Mr. Bumb

I can confirm Sheikah’s redirection worked.. Mr-Paul either made a mistake, or thought “all characters are known anyway”, and took his target anyway. I once again stopped Topsy Turvy. He was not my original target. ###### To be frank, Dedede’s not got the time to post a little info, yet he does have time to send in his target. I’m happy to continue where we left off yesterday.

@Bob, from memory:

0123456789 Haha. Me and my formatting..

No. Like I said, ReZ pulled a stunt like this before, but I can’t remember the details, or which mafia it actually was. I believe he was town, and I believe the accused was actually mafia afterall, but the lynch didn’t go through because town wasn’t willing to go for it. I’m really not sure, but maybe ReZ himself remembers which mafia I’m talking about, so we can find out. Anyway, that, plus the fact that I expected more out of dedede’s response, is why I’m giving ReZ the benefit of the doubt for now, and it’s why I’m not removing my vote. We can always lynch ReZ afterwards.

###### And @ Peeps: It’s not just based on that anymore. Call ReZ’s stunt anything you want, but dedede’s defense was rather pathetic.

Does anyone else still want to vote / unvote within 10 minutes? Otherwise I’ll post a number.

I’m really inclined to vote for ReZ, problem is, this isn’t the first time he pulled this stunt. Though he was town then, and it almost worked in town’s favour if I recall correctly.. Which doesn’t mean this wouldn’t have been very convenient if this worked now and he was mafia. That said, Dedede’s defense is rather disappointing. I’m also not in favour of a no lynch, it’s either Lazy or Daydream as far as I’m concerned. I’m giving ReZ the benefit of the doubt right now, and I’ll keep my vote where it is.

Then I’ll vote: ReZ unless he can give us a reasonable explanation. Of course, it would be great if @Dedede could chime in as well.

Actually I want to hear from ReZ. Depending on his reply, I may or may not change my vote to him. .. But maybe he used one of his gems. ###### Ale roleblocking actions are accounted for I believe. We haven’t heard of any redirectors.. Jonnas, now you’ve come out, you might as well provide the details of your role and your PM. Does your PM not state whether you were successful or not? Mine does.. It specifically says if I was successful and who my target was.

Yeah it must be Dedede. And I forgot all about the “most votes” lynch, so vote: Mr. Lazy His profile says he was on today.. Well he’s probably at work. Can’t wait for his reply tonight then.

As for I concluded Rummy must be Mr. Lazy: I’d gone through all people who had posted, and checked who had made any claims (or were confirmed), and for the ones I didn’t know their (claimed) character, I checked if they voted Mr. Lazy. I believe that just left Rummy, but I could be mistaken. I’m too lazy / busy to check it right away again, I’ll do so tonight.. If I’m not mistaken, but Rummy is also telling the truth, that means either someone made a false claim, or there’s a mafia hopping on the bandwagon (I find the latter more plausible). @Sheikah Remember that mistake I made with forgetting Yvonne’s character? I realised soon after, but it wasn’t until Mr-Paul commented on being stopped by laughter, that I found out my actual target (which was of course Topsy Turvy). As for your other question.. No.

Actually, Rummy was online tonight, so I’m assuming he was deliberately ignoring the thread. At this point I’d like to know from @DuD what the deadline is (and perhaps the vote count) before I vote.

Wasn’t sure whether to thank you for a funny caption or to curse you for reminding me of Miley Cyrus.

“Ah good, it matches with my tie.”

I did, but I’m not (yet) keeping notes, and I forgot Yvonne’s character. Eevil must have targeted Yvonne.

I believe that leaves @Rummy to be Mr. Lazy. For the record, I stopped Topsy Turvy / Mr. Paul.