Jon Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 Vast array of modes? Interesting comment. Lab Deathmatch Elimination Turf War King of the Hill Chain Reaction Survival Siege Gold Rush Plunder Machinima Coop Missions It's not going to win any awards for the having the most but it suits the description I used.
dwarf Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 We only ever play Daethmatch and Plunder. Bar one or two, the lab has been shit, and is only temporary. Very few people are found in other modes, because they're pants. Some of those are co-op, and are illegible for this discussion. What is Machinima?
Jon Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 We only ever play Daethmatch and Plunder. Bar one or two, the lab has been shit, and is only temporary. Very few people are found in other modes, because they're pants. Some of those are co-op, and are illegible for this discussion. What is Machinima? The vast (lolz) majority of them are shit but they're still there, if you can find someone else there to play with (hah). I have no idea what Machinima is but it keeps coming up in google searches for UNC 2 mulitplayer and I can't be arsed turning the game on to check.
ReZourceman Posted October 27, 2010 Author Posted October 27, 2010 Its the white one with all the weapons.
Shorty Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 ReZ has there ever been an internet fakery that you didn't fall for?
ReZourceman Posted October 27, 2010 Author Posted October 27, 2010 ReZ has there ever been an internet fakery that you didn't fall for? Not that I am aware of.
Oxigen_Waste Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 A poor man's Gears of War meets Tomb Raider? Hmmm. Definite disagreement. While I liked the first one, that's how I always felt about it. It's value was blown out of proportion, to me, it's a good game, yes, but not the messianic prophet of great gaming people made it out to be. To me, it was just GOW meets TR. Ooh, is that McNulty on your av? Which is maybe why I enjoyed the second one so much, because I wasn't really expecting anything but more of the same.
dwarf Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 While I liked the first one, that's how I always felt about it. It's value was blown out of proportion, to me, it's a good game, yes, but not the messianic prophet of great gaming people made it out to be. To me, it was just GOW meets TR. Ooh, is that McNulty on your av? Which is maybe why I enjoyed the second one so much, because I wasn't really expecting anything but more of the same. I thought it was just generally agreed that it was a good action game. Not a messianic prophet of gaming. I'd say it's infinitely better than Gears, man I hate that franchise. Ooh also: 'What the fuck did I do?'
Oxigen_Waste Posted October 27, 2010 Posted October 27, 2010 I thought it was just generally agreed that it was a good action game. Not a messianic prophet of gaming. I'd say it's infinitely better than Gears, man I hate that franchise. Well, it was in the early PS3 phase, so it got a better reputation than it deserved, thanks to the lack of games, is what I meant. And about Gears, I loved them when I played them, but right now I'm not that interested in the whole concept of it... meh.
Recommended Posts