Daft Posted January 3, 2009 Author Posted January 3, 2009 I googled it and apparently there will be co-op but it'll come in a patch when it launches. What sort of co-op they don't say.
dwarf Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Good good. I'm not too bothered about it myself but I guess it will stop my friend winging about FPS games that don't allow for teamage.
dazzybee Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 OH Deadspace is GOOOOOD. What chapter are you on? And just realised you have a ps3 even though you I have just remembered that you said you had one awhile ago or something to that effect so will add just now. anyways, I swear that Killzone 1 had a co-op mode. Makes sense as there were 4 playable characters. Yeah I'm loving it. Only just done chapter 2 so pretty early on (I think). Accepted you request by the way. How does this cover promote co-op play?
Deathjam Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Yeah I'm loving it. Only just done chapter 2 so pretty early on (I think). Accepted you request by the way. How does this cover promote co-op play? It has 4 people on the front (technically 5 if you count the helghast soldier) as if it to say the main character is not fighing alone.
dwarf Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 That is very vague though, loads of box arts have that and don't feature co-op modes.
Deathjam Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 That is very vague though, loads of box arts have that and don't feature co-op modes. Im just seeing it from Pit-Jr's point of view, but it seems it will have co-op eventually so this is now a moot point (wonder what that actual phrase means...).
dazzybee Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Im just seeing it from Pit-Jr's point of view, but it seems it will have co-op eventually so this is now a moot point (wonder what that actual phrase means...). The phrase has garnered a new meaning in a way; it's 'supposed' to mean arguable. Which doesn't make sense in the context people use it now. The new meaning it's completely irrelevant, pointless, moot.... PS When I was younger I thought it was 'mute' point. A sort of sarcastic saying, that what people are saying is that inane it's as useful/insightful as silence........
Deathjam Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 The phrase has garnered a new meaning in a way; it's 'supposed' to mean arguable. Which doesn't make sense in the context people use it now. The new meaning it's completely irrelevant, pointless, moot.... PS When I was younger I thought it was 'mute' point. A sort of sarcastic saying, that what people are saying is that inane it's as useful/insightful as silence........ You know, that happens alot. It would make so much sense if it was spelt one way but thanks to english, it's made that more complicated. Anyways, we are now totally oftopic so to get back on track, have people started pre-ordering this yet?
dwarf Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 I don't usually pre-order because of the high prices, but If I see somewhere that lists it for £30 I'll probably lap it up.
Deathjam Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Actually, I just remembered that I plan to trade in a game for it. What game though, I am not sure...
dwarf Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Well I don't care too much for a special edition but trying to find out about it I learned instead that Europe will get this 2 days before US - 25th Feb
Daft Posted January 3, 2009 Author Posted January 3, 2009 Well I don't care too much for a special edition but trying to find out about it I learned instead that Europe will get this 2 days before US - 25th Feb Really? Awesome.
Daft Posted January 3, 2009 Author Posted January 3, 2009 Really awesome All right, shut it you. I'm actually really excited about this. I didn't think I could get too into online games unless it was a beta. I love the Halo 3, CoD4 and MGS4 Online Betas but when the games came out I didn't touch them. I have been playing Resistance 2 online, although I think I'm going to return that to get another rental, so I'm now looking for a good online game and this looks perfect. Does anyone else have this with Betas?
dwarf Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Well getting into a beta is a buzz and makes you feel cool for getting in it, but doing well at it seems a bit pointless. I've now found great enjoyment with Resistance 2 because I win quite a lot now and it is just brilliant.
flameboy Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 All right, shut it you. I'm actually really excited about this. I didn't think I could get too into online games unless it was a beta. I love the Halo 3, CoD4 and MGS4 Online Betas but when the games came out I didn't touch them. I have been playing Resistance 2 online, although I think I'm going to return that to get another rental, so I'm now looking for a good online game and this looks perfect. Does anyone else have this with Betas? I'm kinda the same. Got into the R2 beta loved it and played it and tried to put time into the retail release. But there has been that much I just havn't had the time to invest in it enough. So much other stuff to play and then of course life to get on with lol! I am hoping though with Killzone being in a relative quiet patch, might find the time to really get into the online.
Dante Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 Rumour OPM Review Killzone 2 - 5/5 "The buddies alongside you in each battle have been expertly tuned to provide just enough cover and support to actively get your back on occasions, while never making it feel like they could acchieve every objective alone." "...the believability and consistency are hallmarks of the Killzone 2 expereince. None of the circumstances, weapons you find, locations you visit, or frankly any of the details in the world feel arbitrary. The world is consistently realized in its unappealing flavor." "...filled with moments that can handily be described as inspiring awe" - bots in offline multiplayer "perform pretty well" "Without a doubt Killzone fans, action, and shooter fans of any stripe will isntantly tag this sequel as a powerful contender for teh best game of 2009"
Daft Posted January 3, 2009 Author Posted January 3, 2009 What are OPM's scores usual like? I imagine pretty generous.
Hero-of-Time Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 What are OPM's scores usual like? I imagine pretty generous. Here's what some of their scores are. Also, before you go spitting out that it got these scores just because its a PS magazine, I suggest you look at the previous exclusives they have reviewed. Uncharted [80] Heavenly Sword [80] Warhawk [65] GT5P [80] MotorStorm: PR [60] Haze [50] Lair [50] Resistance 2 [80] MGS4 [100]
Daft Posted January 3, 2009 Author Posted January 3, 2009 Here's what some of their scores are. That's good. I agree with all those scores except maybe Uncharted. Probably would have given that a 90. I think it was slightly more than the sum of its pretty good parts. That's encouraging then. Damn Feb 25th is so far off.
MATtheHAT Posted January 3, 2009 Posted January 3, 2009 You know, that happens alot. It would make so much sense if it was spelt one way but thanks to english, it's made that more complicated. Anyways, we are now totally oftopic so to get back on track, have people started pre-ordering this yet? Yep, along with Street Fighter IV and Resident Evil 5. Late Feb/early March has a few potentially fantastic games being released.
dwarf Posted January 4, 2009 Posted January 4, 2009 FFS I get so annoyed when reviewers piss all over Motorstorm: PR. It is AWESOME. They really could not have made it much better! The tracks are insane, gives you great sense of speed and the crashes are brilliant. Sorry but the reviewers are arseholes. Just because it is a sequel it should not be marked down by that much, no way. It improves everything and has split-screen added... How can it possibly be lower? Grrrr!
Deathjam Posted January 5, 2009 Posted January 5, 2009 Dont worry about that. Its much better than R2 in VS. Its the best fps i have played in a long long time in that regards Just to show you they are taking multiplayer very seriously: Online stats. Bear in mind the game doe snot have desfrutible environments. More like some limited destruction of objects and cover. In single player there is some destruction but its mainly for looks. Hope that makes sense. Also in multiplayer the class gameplay is key. Teams have to focus on their specialities and broaden their skills. When you first start off you only have a basic soldier and you have to unlock everything from entry to squads to medic badge and its abilities. *Takes one look at picture then runs off to preorder*
Daft Posted January 6, 2009 Author Posted January 6, 2009 I hope there is something explaining the story so far because I'm a KillZone noob.
Recommended Posts