Shino Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 They have women only carriages these days. Which means the ones that go on the other carriages don't really mind.
Dan_Dare Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 They have women only carriages these days. great. segregation is way cooler than education, yeah?
RoadKill Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 great. segregation is way cooler than education, yeah? Of course! Back of the bus, niggers
RoadKill Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desu Mostly it's used for pointless spamming for little reason Edit: As clearly exampled below, by Shino
Shino Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 Desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu desu. Any more posts like this here and I'll get deletey. "DESU" JA NAI YO NE! - Supergrunch
MoogleViper Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 Yes this is wrong but don't forget. It wasn't that long ago in this country that most women were married by the age of 14 to men in their twenties and older. Somebody at my school (younger than me) lost her virginity when she was twelve to an 18 year old. My own cousin went out with a 17 year old when she was 13. I don't think they did anything. The guy actually said to my auntie, "I won't do anything with her because she's too young." Then why the fuck are you with her?
RoadKill Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 Yes this is wrong but don't forget. It wasn't that long ago in this country that most women were married by the age of 14 to men in their twenties and older. Somebody at my school (younger than me) lost her virginity when she was twelve to an 18 year old. My own cousin went out with a 17 year old when she was 13. I don't think they did anything. The guy actually said to my auntie, "I won't do anything with her because she's too young." Then why the fuck are you with her? True, why was the guy with her? I would have fucked her senseless. Pussy.
MoogleViper Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 True, why was the guy with her? I would have fucked her senseless. Pussy. Or maybe he should have gone with somebody a little closer to his age. Somebody who is post-pubescent.
Shino Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 I never knew a 12 year old that was that innocent, I remember that the older the guy was the more they wanted it.
RoadKill Posted March 12, 2008 Posted March 12, 2008 Or maybe he should have gone with somebody a little closer to his age. Somebody who is post-pubescent. Yeah, I know, but what was he even thinking in the first place
RoadKill Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I <3 you for that. May I have your babies? Shit, why not
Jamba Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 This discussion is weird, I find it strange that no one seems to be seperating child porn, loli and paedophilia all that much. Am I the only one who finds it worse that we (UK) sexualise kids openly, dressing them in crop tops and g-strings with "so many men, so little time" printed on them compared to printing young looking manga characters? Obviously child porn is disturbed because it takes advantage of young children but I'm not sure that the arguement that "loli leads to paedophilia" is solid at all. Like I have said above, I think that what happens with the children in this country encourages paedophilia just as much if not more so. I wouldn't be surprised if we have a much bigger paedophilia problem here.
RoadKill Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 Yeah, the general sexualisation of kids in many cultures is probably way worse, and makes kids think they have to act older from the start, and lolicon has nothing to do with it - the general public doesn't know what the fuck lolicon is, but they sure as hell see all these skimpy outfits being sold, and child modelling, beauty contests, etc, which are clearly making an exhibit of the child, whereas lolicon might be sick (or hot) but it doesn't actually involve a real child.
Jamba Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 Haha.... people should watch Little Miss Sunshine. That film is pure GOLD. Also (going totally out on a limb here) I'm not totally sure that lolicon is wrong.
RoadKill Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 Also (going totally out on a limb here) I'm not totally sure that lolicon is wrong. Well from a free speech standpoint, banning fiction, complete works of fiction, simply imagination, committed to paper - banning something like that is a pleasing slippery slope to letting the government control everything we should be able to do in our own home, regardless of whether it hurts anyone (I think we can all agree that drawing something cannot directly cause harm). They kind of did this with racism here in the UK, except they did make sure to not enforce it too zealously, (as far as I'm aware) so comedians making possibly racist jokes aren't suddenly carted off to jail.
MoogleViper Posted March 13, 2008 Posted March 13, 2008 I wouldn't be surprised if we have a much bigger paedophilia problem here. I don't know how big it is in Japan, but it isn't actually that big over here. Now I'm not saying that it doesn't happen but the media make out that it's a daily thing.
RoadKill Posted March 14, 2008 Posted March 14, 2008 THE INTERNET. WHERE EVERYBODY IS A PAEDO! You might be on your own there buddy. You're not, but you might be :P
Recommended Posts