Fierce_LiNk

Urgh, here comes Twincest.

Fuck yeah, Denmark's entry is awesome. The best thing they've done since Peter Schmeichel.

WHAAAAAAAAAAT? Whyyy have you forsaaaaken meee? No Belgium either. This is a fucking scandal! Fuck it, Austria it is. Home of Arnie.

For some reason, I always want Malta to do well. So, I'm going for them. CMAAAAN MALTA!

It's embarrassing that people are jizzing over two 13 year old games that they have probably played over and over again. And, if you haven't, then shame on you. If there were no opportunities to play these two games since 1998, then we could let it slide. But, Ocarina in particular has had quite a few releases, such as the master quest with Wind Waker. If you guys really can't wait to play Starfox, why not just do it on the VC? Or better still, dig out that N64 and play it like it was originally meant to be played. Considering there's not an awful lot that is different to this version and the one you played before, why not? For a new system, (a new Nintendo system, I might add), the fact that you're hyping over this is just ludicrous. But, Nintendo knows that they could repackage these games in tin foil, feature an additional soundbite, and a keyring made of sardines, and they know it would still sell. Well, more fool you. Give us what we truly want, Nintendo. A new fucking Starfox. A simple Starfox title, in the style of Starwing or Lylat Wars.

Nothing can condone that level of behaviour. It's not really bad for Scottish football, but football in general. It's a shame that the sport gets a bad rep for fan's behaviour, such as this.

I'm probably in the minority here, but I didn't/don't really understand why people were getting all that excited about this in the first place. Sure, I loved this game when I played it on the N64. Same goes for Ocarina of Time. But, a lot of time has passed since then. Why do we feel the need to re-buy these games anyway? Unless its a full all out remake, on a par with the Resident Evil remake (and maybe that still isn't enough), I don't really see the point. I know we love this game, but really, it shouldn't be a game we should be hyping up this much. Same goes with Ocarina. It's...a bit embarrassing really. I'll get my flamecoat ready.

Personally, I'm not bothered about Dohnut right now. I feel that he can be saved for another day, I'm not really getting a vibe that's he evil or is trying to throttle us in our sleep. He's got a very difficult role to play, and in fairness to him, he came out very early in the game with his information. My only qualm with him is about this win condition. Dohnut, if you really want to stay until the end, we need to find this out. Although, it could be a case of you hiding your win condition from us, which is a possibility (you can't deny that). We need more leads. I've had an uneasy feeling about Chairdriver, but I'm not sure about him.

Chair said he tried to target me but failed. Don't know why. So, I'm afraid I can't confirm anything about that. I thought your power had been improved? What was that about your eyesight?

Hi, I'm Chucky. Wanna plaaaay? Seen the three original films when I was much younger. I enjoyed them.

I am foreskin-less and I can confirm that sex is good. Make of that what you will. Don't know where all this shiatsu about taking 40 minutes to finish comes from. What was she doing? Covering him in yoghurt?

I'm going to admit that I had that possibility when I read that in the write-up and then the following discussion. It could be used as a distraction technique/decoy, yes?

Yeah, it does seem very dramatic. I took that as Jonnas trying to add suspense to the whole thing. The game seems to be revolving around whether the Dohnut and the Dane deserve to live or die. If eet bleeds, we can keel eet. At the moment, I don't have much quarrel with them. So, I'm at a loss with that one. Really like to hear from Zell, though. Does he normally play games this quiet?

Lol, yeah, I made you seem all shady-like on purpose. The write-up said you re-directed someone from their original path. Maddog confirmed I targeted you. You confirmed you were a re-director. And nobody thought it worth discussing any further. If anything, it made you coming out about your role a hell of a lot easier than it could have been. We already knew Zell was a thief, so sadly we didn't get any more info about him. Question though (to Zell): Have you stolen anything so far in this game? There was something about a cape? Anything else. I've found you very quiet so would like to learn more.

Hasta La Vista....Baby!

I was just about to come in here and remove my vote, as I saw we were close to the majority. Wanted to give the guy a chance to speak. Aw well. It's done now. Lets see. If eet bleeds. We can keel eet.

I'm pretty sure Cube is town. Don't really have any reason to suspect him. Anyway, what time is Marca back? I feel we've said pretty much all there is to be said for today, so we're waiting for his move.

I wasn't pointing just him out, but talking about those types of players. I dunno, maybe he'll surprise us all and become a Park sorta character who is pretty hard to displace from the team. Defenders need to be like warriors. Sometimes when you're defending, you forget it's a football match and you envisage yourself going for much more than the ball. And, that willpower drives you on to claim that ball. Everytime I see Vidic going for a header, I know that he's going to get it, because he wants to get that ball and stop it going anywhere near the goal. You need a defender with that sorta mindset. Problem is, they are very rare. You can probably find a good amount of decent or even good centre-backs. But those Puyol or Lucio type of characters, they only come by every so often.

I know Arsenal have had better days, but surely days like this are when you know you need high quality players in that position. I don't rate Djourou (sp?) and I think he's just one of these players who is put into that position to get by. He won't ever keep that position for himself, if you know what I mean. As a fifth choice or something, or as a utility player, good, but...not what you need. You've seen what happen when you go for actual quality. You get somebody like Vermaelen, or Arshavin (when he was actually good.)

Oh, I didn't once say it was definitely what was going on. Merely that it was a possibility. It was one argument with Diageo's reasoning that lynching Marca proves his town-ness, which in my honest opinion, it doesn't.

If Blackpool did, then yeah, we should as well, in the interest of consistency. But, at the same time, it is stupid. Also, as cruel as it is to say, United, Chelsea, Blackpool, whoever...they don't owe the other teams anything. If United want to go with a 4-3-3 with 3 strikers in that last game, and go overly attacking, then they have a right to. If they want to play with 1 up top, they have every right to. It's not our concern what goes on with other teams. Harsh, but it's the truth. Also, another way of looking at it is...players will be playing for their Champions League places. So, if it is a slightly weaker team, they'll still put in a good performance anyway. Besides, what exactly is a weakened United team? With Anderson and Gibson in the middle? The same two who ran the second leg against Schalke? I'm all for this 25 man squad rule. Provided the manager has the say on whatever team he chooses. Are the FA going to provide each team with a list of all the possible team combinations they're allowed? Edit: If I remember right, Pool lost 3-2 to Villa.

How have you been "almost proven to be good"? Also, it's not ridiculous and unfair if Marca is in on it. It's not mean if they're in on it. Maybe you wouldn't, but I'm not totally ruling anything out. It's important to look at every conceivable angle. If it can be done, then surely it needs to be looked at.

We wouldn't be fined if we won the game. We did it before against Hull, on the last day of the season, and won the game 1-0. It's a retarded rule anyway. You have 25 players, you should be allowed to use all 25 as you see fit. Should Chelsea get fined for leaving their 50 million quid striker on the bench? Should United get fined for leaving their 30 million 21 goal-this-season-scoring striker on the bench? Of course not. It's complete cock.

Doublepost: Uhh...yes? It's a really fucking good idea, and I'll be honestly surprised if nobody has done this before.