Walfaeder

The key difference is they're factionalised conflicts. While your post was detailed and admirable, it misses the point of M-PG71C post.

I blame this post for the heroic death of my thread.

Some Recs for an Om fan; Sleep (naturally) Electric Wizard Saint Vitus Spirit Caravan Jesu

I'd have to say Jesu.

Om Stoner/Doom Metal United States of America (Oakland, California) Southern Lord Active Current line-up Al Cisneros - Bass, Vocals (Sleep, Asbestos Death) Emil Amos - Drums (Grails) 'Om' is the Hindu syllable known as the natural vibration of the universe, often used as a mantra (a rhythmic ritual word that Hindus use and repeat for a long time when getting in trance mental states). The bands lyrics deal with matters of the spiritual. http://www.myspace.com/variationsontheme http://www.omvibratory.com/

I can guess who you are. How is life? I've not heard from you in years.

Why not apply that logic to mainstream society then?

Hmm. How so?

Mora Frostclipper. Really good for splitting logs I've learnt thus far.

Athabaskan?

Technology interests me as a tool. At some point during my travels I realised I was honestly happier when I was living out of a backpack. When I got home I threw out a hell of a lot of stuff. I have clothes, books, this computer; aswell as various smaller items of technology such as a Phone, Mp3 Player and Camera. If it's portable, than towards that end I am still materialistic, I suppose. The difference being I don't buy for the sake of buying anymore, as I used to. Taking games as an anology here, I'm sure we've all gone and bought a game we didn't really intent to, just for the sake of playing something new. That's no longer something I can justify. Exactly, amazing really. You're correct to that end, Humanity is quite predictable when all is said and done. See here folks, this is the kind of person that justifies Green Genocide. Agreed, it'll take more than that. It'll take a complete social shift to take such a concept in its stride. Your concept of the Human race as R-selected is interesting, however I disagree. Our mass reproduction is not a response to threat but a product of success. A popular theme of Science Fiction is abandoning Earth once we've destroyed its biosphere. Let's hope we can resolve our issues with this planet before going on to ruin another.

You're welcome. Evola interests me, like all good Philosophers of the modern age, he was batshit insane. His concept of Radical Traditionalism, while totally impractical as a model for our current society, sounds admirable (at least, to someone such as myself), to quote; "Radical Traditionalism seeks to revive pre-modern values of "the Indo-European Tradition" concerning the spiritual aspects of life. In contrast to modern culture, which they see as marked by materialism, mechanization and urbanism, radical traditionalists promote traditional and local culture and folklore, respectful treatment of the earth and animals, and small-scale organization of society (distributism, localism)." As for your statement on Green Genocide, you're correct. As a means for War, it's certainly no less justified than any other potential casus belli. While the only way to get a green ideology to work is to have the body politic unify with it, the old saying "the only position of power a minority group has is through the use of violence" has proven itself time and again to be sadly true.

Mhmm, I'd accuse you there of thinking from a social bound. The concept of green ideology is no more far fetched, and indeed less extreme than many sopho-political systems seen the world over. While speaking from a person of our time and place it's unlikely, to suggest in a different circumstance only a dunce would find said ideology applicable is naive. Your statement on the ethics of war is all in essence correct, though it deviates from the concept I was getting at. And that is Post such a war (assuming it is a War that affects us first, and not Pandemic or Natural Disaster) how would a reappraisal of such an ideology progress? In reference to Julius Evola, perhaps you could benefit from reading this. Based entirely on the extracts I've read, it's an interesting dissertation from a man who went on to influence Fascisti; Metaphysics of War: Battle, Victor & Death in the World of Tradition by Julius Evola.

Really? That's incredibly rare now. I expect if you were, you'd know full well about it.

La Science des rêves Great, but without Kaufman Gondry's vision suffers and lacks essential directional backbone. 7.0 Ruang rak noi nid mahasan Incredible, Ratanaruang is a rising force in Asian cinema. 9.6 Y tu mamá también Fiesty little film packed with latin flavour, I enjoyed it. 8.5

So, N-Europe, I was wondering what your thoughts are on the subjects of Deep Ecology and Eco-Fascism. For those needing a little light shed, here's some Wiki articles that'll easily equip you with enough knowledge to develop a stance and opinion; Deep Ecology Ecofascism Futhermore, here's the Wiki page of Pentii Linkola, the Mussolini of Ecofascism, as it were. It's of particular interest to me what you folk think, as the very concept of this forum is built around the world of cutting-edge technology, Mankind in a dissassociative yet thriving form. Before this message begins I ought to state my position on this topic initially. I follow neither practice or theory, but they're currently the subject of my personal learnings at the moment, hence my willingness to engage in debate over them. I'll post my developed opinions should this thread take off. Deep Ecology is lauded by some as a Hippy concept. It's easy to see why, any serious attention paid to the restoration and protection of the natural world is oft mocked in the face of seemingly more important socio-political topics. What stands between Deep Ecology and your average Green philosophy is as the name suggests, it's intents are Deep. To not look at a Green stance as an insular field but understand how it ties in with all aspects of our society and by extension, economy. Do you think were such a theory given a chance, it could make a difference? Discuss. The prime doctrine of Eco-fascism is naturally an extreme concept. The proposition within this theory is that in order to restore the natural ecological order of this planet (and with it, crushing the impact of Man's catalysm on climate change) we, as a species, must go against our nature and seek to limit and actively depopulate Earth. Basic calculations suggest that the planet in its arable form could sustain 1.5 billion people, but naturally the concept of Eco-fascism is calling for a disgusting loss of human life, the largest genocide in history - billions. Considerably dwarfing Holocaust figures it goes unsaid. So from a Humanist perspective, it's obviously wrong. What, however, of matters of depopulation outside intentional means? By this I mean War, Pandemic and Natural Disaster, the triumvirate of social destruction! I ask you, General Chit Chat, what do you believe would be the prerogatives for a considerably depopulated Human race in light of such a catastrophe. Would we seek to return to exactly what we have now? Or would be reappraise what went wrong, seek a greater unity with the world we live on and hope to benefit from the experience? Again, please discuss if you have a mind to. PS Has anybody read the works of Julius Evola? I'm curious whether they're of interest.

I don't allow myself to be bogged down by the trivialities of recent generations. Based on a mix of meta-ancestral research and anthropological taxonomy, I can trace my blood to the Northern Rhineland, which my DNA departed some 1600 years ago.

Ew, quick, have some good rap;

Dalo-Faelid

Isn't it great that it's actually all true however? :P

Stupid thread locked before I could post. I've travelled the world, taken strange substances in deep jungles, conquered lofty peaks, watched the sun rise over a megalithic temple and set in a barren desert. I've loved, loathed and led people over many miles and months. I've learnt and developed a unique ecological philsophy rooted in the corpus of all the world's established religions, I've learnt bush and firecraft to such an extent survival in the wilderness is not only a theoretical but actual possibility for myself. I'm strong, grounded, confident and collected. : peace:

Where'd your puppy fat go? Sweet as bro.

I dare you to state a period of time in which I wasn't sexy.

Social Darwinism works.

There are harder things in life than growing and maintaining hair!