Diageo

I only protect from kills so that can't be true Peeps.

There are also facial characteristics that portray subtle personality traits. You regularly hear of people looking like assholes or like nice people.

Well you can't exactly advertise your personality on it.

I targeted myself the past 2 nights.

Well it could act as a release so they don't have to do it for real. I think the only course of action would be to teach the person to control their urges so that it's not manifested, in any manner that is not detrimental to others. I don't think we can say whether that should be encouraged or not until there is research on repressing over expressing paedophilic thoughts.

Like everyone's said, they're both important. While I would think physical attractiveness is more important to attraction and inner beauty is more important towards affection. While personality can change someone's perception of their physical attractiveness, physical attractiveness also changes people's perceptions of personality. The Halo effect being that people attribute good things to beautiful people, and are more likely to overlook flaws.

Eliminate what possibilities? If the mafia know what kind of patterns I protect, they'll be able to learn who are more likely to protect.

I was gonna get to paedophilia eventually It's a bit tied into bestiality too, where the problem is that the party they're attracted to can never give proper consent, and so really it's their bad luck. Certainly there's nothing we can do to change it at this moment in time, so they have to make do with representations of children such as drawings and virtual reality.

What would giving my targets help with?

All right, since discussion seems to have died for this topic, let's move to another one. Cure for Homosexuality If in the future we discover the exact cause of homosexuality, and therefore a way to reverse it. Should all humans be treated so as there is no further discrimination and prejudice? Should mothers be allowed to change a baby's sexuality before they are born, and should people who are homosexual be allowed to get themselves treated if they wanted to? Of course I don't think of homosexuality as a sickness that needs a cure. But if the resources were available, should we allow people to use it, or is it better to not go down this slippery slope?

I also think because of the constant barrage of depravity coming from his fans, he should no longer be allowed to communicate with them.

Daydream is ReZ. Vote Mr Tickle who is Sméagol right?

Well from what I've read here and what I've picked up from the thread, he committed several crimes that netted him a "life" sentence in prison (which I assume is the max). He will be unable to commit any further crimes while in there, and so the issue will be controlled. What the prison should include is some sort of work he can do so that his time in prison isn't a strain on the economy. It should also include a rehabilitation systems that increases his fitness for society life after his sentence is over, which he may return to only if he is deemed appropriate to return by medical professionals, and that he will no longer abuse drugs. I am unaware of how much money he currently has and what will happen to it, but I assume he will go into a nursing home of some sort afterwards, living the rest of his days as an old man, with some instance of supervision to make sure there will be no re-offending.

From that image the Wii U characters look brighter than the 3DS ones.

One can understand that their actions will be stopped if they are caught and that keeping it secret will allow it to continue, and still be mentally defective. The brain is a complex system with many dissociated functions that work independently of each other.

The idea that for something to be a sickness the victim has to realise they have it and seek help is a false assumption to make. Do you not think the fact that he thought it was "mega lolz" that he is indeed mentally defective?

I think you're being very condescending with your post. Opinions are not only given for acceptance or convincement, especially in forums. When I give most of my opinions I'm not trying to convince anyone or look for acceptance, I'm just giving another point of view that people are welcome to accept or not. To say his opinion is void because he doesn't use your principles of argument is a lacking conclusion. This isn't a debate, but a conversation. Albeit no longer a fantastic conversation but if you want to give someone advice, insulting them or treating them like a child will invoke an emotional defence response that will impede any sort of rational deliberation.

Which would be considered "enough".

Obsessive compulsive disorder.

Apple seeds contain a small amount of cyanide and if you eat enough you can die.

That's one of the main reasons why I didn't particularly care about that story, since I didn't ingest the nails. I do however eat the skin around my fingers nowadays, which I think is tasty and satisfying.

My mam told me if I bit my nails that a nail tree would grow in my stomach and burst out.

Oops. vote mr nosey

And in the URL itself. As well as that, you just attacked someone who clearly has been told they're stupid for a long time and probably doesn't need someone else saying it. And while correcting someone's grammar can be fun and all, it's frankly a little weird to attack someone who clearly doesn't know you unless they have deleterious views on something.