Julius

TFA didn’t have a space battle but I agree, Rogue One’s space battle was superbly directed, as was the entire third act of that film. It’s a shame it’s built on such rocky foundations, at least for me, when it comes to the first two acts I love to rewatch Star Wars films, but I think it’s one of those which is difficult to return to again and again because I find it to be so lopsided. As for Solo: haven’t watched it. I’m seeing mixed-to-positive reactions here, but as a massive Star Wars fan, I wouldn’t feel any urge to rush out and see this film, but especially given the timing of it (during exam season). If this were Episode IX or something like Rogue One, I’d probably have seen it a few times by now, but I’m genuinely in no rush, and it might be the first time that I just wait for the blu-ray. @Agent Gibbs, I think that’s why it’s crashed and burned at the box office, on top of being surrounded on all sides by films of excellent quality, many of which are from under the same Mouse-owned roof. I don’t think that the casual audience is burned out on Star Wars if all that they watch are the films, but I do feel like I’m personally getting there. The Last Jedi was exhausting for me as a fan, but I ended up loving it; then Rebels ended a few months ago in superb fashion, and both of these pieces of storytelling had a plethora of characters that I have been invested in for years. The lack of emotional investment that I have in the Solo cast as a whole going into the film isn’t their fault, but I do hope that Disney and Lucasfilm learn a valuable lesson from this: in a world with the MCU, simply applying the Star Wars branding won’t cut it. A prequel depicting Han Solo’s rise isn’t compelling because the only people that I’m invested in here going in are Han, Lando, and Chewie, and I know that they all survive. Rogue One was easy to become invested in because the event that it depicted was one we were already invested in due to the original film’s setup. Both of these spin-off films have also had massive problems behind-the-scenes, which makes me worry about Lucasfilm not trusting their directors and writers. I just hope that they learn. The Last Jedi was proof that they’re willing to take (seemingly) enormous risks to shake up the foundation of the franchise, but that’s put to bed instantly when we then go back and get told the story of Han Solo, which, by comparison, is such a safe move. I’m getting a lot of mixed signals from Lucasfilm is all I can say without having seen the film, but I’m not at all surprised that it’s performing so badly. I’ll probably try to see it if it’s still showing after my exams are finished, but if not...

Man, I love stuff like this. And damn, that buff Noctowl looks ready to take names and eat bugs.

Egypt have confirmed that Salah will be fit to return for the World Cup, thank goodness. Sarri has also reportedly held positive talks with our folks over in Milan, so hopefully that’s a deal which will be ironed out in the next few weeks.

Honestly, at this point, I think that the post-game itself has been whittled down to what they see as an obligatory checklist more so than anything else. I hate to say that, but the quality and quantity of what we’ve had to do in the post-game has been on a rapid decline since the DS games. I mean, XY’s had three legendaries (if I recall correctly, with virtually no context) - a roaming legendary bird, Mewtwo, Zygarde - and the Battle Maison. ORAS’ had the Delta Episode, which is relatively short; a ridiculous amount of legendary Pokémon coming out of floating dimensional hoops, but, again, with zero context; and the return of the Battle Maison. SM had a couple of routes and the Battle Tree. I can’t comment on USUM’s, as I haven’t played those games. As someone who isn’t that interested in the competitive side of things - not for the want of trying, but, rather, for the lack of time to invest - I really do feel like the DS titles spoiled me and anyone like me who doesn’t dive into the competitive side of things. Before, the time that I did invest outside of Battle Facilities still seemed worthwhile, because I was still rewarded with the levelling up of my Pokémon, but most games seem to run out of challenging trainers to throw the player’s way come the mid-Lv. 60s. Diamond and Pearl had a lot of legendaries with contextual relevance to the game, which continues the sense of exploration; an entire island to explore; the Battle Tower; and Wi-Fi mythical events which didn’t just hand you legendary Pokémon on a silver platter, but actually had some context. Platinum added four more Battle Facilities and Gym Leader rematches. Many argue that GSC/HGSS doesn’t have much of a post-game, as they don’t consider Kanto to be post-game but a continuation of the story, and I can’t exactly disagree with them, but those games are filled with enough content as it is. Black and White had a whole new part of the region to explore, and Black and White 2 added some more new areas; the Pokémon World Tournament; a truckload of legendary Pokémon; and a whole lot of rematches. I think they really struggled with post-game content when the transition was made to 3D, because of the focus on technology that such a drastic visual change entails. I just hope that they can deliver a meaningful post-game which caters to their entire audience with next year’s title/s, especially when one considers the hike-up in RRP that we’re likely to see from the 3DS games to the Switch games.

Yeah, I think this is fair. I’ve been trying to spoiler tag any leaks that I’ve posted here, but apologies if I’ve missed any. I’ll add a note at the top of the original post

I think that might have been me I’m not worried about next year’s game at all (I think things are actually shaping up for them to potentially hit it out of the park), but I’m worth you in being worried about what comes beyond that. Now, if Let’s Go becomes a spin-off series and we get one every other year between the traditional core series games, I’m fine with that: so long as I’m kept busy with high quality spin-off Pokémon titles worked on by third parties, like in the heyday of the DS, with series like Conquest, Pokémon Ranger and Mystery Dungeon potentially making a return, alongside complete new and original series. These were great because they still felt immersed in the Pokémon world, and gave another look at the world from the perspective of people who aren’t trainers. What I’m not fine with is potentially remaking every single core series Pokémon game as a Let’s Go title, especially if it means that we don’t see a return to Sinnoh in the traditional remake sense that we saw with FRLG, HGSS and ORAS, and instead end up with Let’s Go Riolu! and Let’s Go Bidoof!. Also, what happens when Let’s Go inevitably takes a sales knock, like every other remake compared to main series titles, or GO slowly starts to fade away? Do Game Freak just drop years of groundwork? I’m happy that they’re taking risks - though, compared to what many have been begging for with Gen VIII, this seems a relatively safe one, at least on the business side of things - but I am worried that they’ll spread themselves to thin. Last I checked, Game Freak had ~170 employees, which isn’t enough to sustain a title a year for a prolonged period of time by any stretch of our imaginations. While it’s certainly possible that this isn’t too much of a stressor for the team, and that they’re getting some help from Niantic and Nintendo proper, and considering that it’s “only” a remake, the fact that Masuda-san is directing these games is kind of worrisome to me because of the lack of directors around Game Freak to swap in and out for the traditional core series games (and, selfishly, that he’s made my favourite Pokémon entries and I’d rather he be spearheading the traditional core series games). As much as I enjoyed SM and ORAS, the Lovecraftian/sci-fi undertones that Ohmori-san is going for in his games is going to take a while to get used to, at least for me. Morimoto-san and Unno-san have other roles at Game Freak too, I’m sure, but they could certainly be in a position to spearhead some games too. As someone who mainly plays for the main story, Pokédex completion and the post-game content, this new direction doesn’t bother me too much, as I only spend ~50 hours with a given core series title these days. But I can understand your concern, @Glen-i, and that of others who have hundreds (if not thousands!) of hours invested in the competitive scene; I’m relatively confident that things will return to normal with Gen VIII next year, and not change too drastically as a result of Let’s Go, but I can appreciate how one with so much time invested in the series would be worried about this new direction, given how it leads to questions about whether your time investment - and, more importantly, enjoyment of the series up to this point - could become watered down or invalidated. I still err on the side of optimism for the future of the series, and I’m happy for those who like what they see in these new titles, I genuinely am. But I do think that those whom currently lean towards worry or pessimism have every right to do so at this stage, both with regards to this pair of games and to the future of the franchise. I do think that there’s been a lot left unsaid, which puts some unnecessary pressure on next year’s title/s.

More info coming during Bethesda’s E3 press conference.

They’re on an absolute roll this year. Did Emily Rogers or someone upset a Walmart employee or something?

@Dcubed, yeah, I definitely think that this is reusing the engine of Gen VII. At this point, judging from the Gen VI-like Chibi character designs, to the camera angle in the overworld, and to the walking animations that were in Sun and Moon, I definitely think it’s a project which has been stop-start and in the works for quite some time, and there are even some jagged edges to the Pokémon and character models on show. Like I said before, maybe it wasn’t always intended as purely a GO-meets-core series game, but perhaps as a fully fledged one for the 20th Anniversary. I’m genuinely not worried about Gen VIII at this point, because I’m already seeing a handful of things with these games that I want to see carried over to the new games. Pokémon in the overworld is something that I’ve been harping on about for a while, and, assuming that this game was in production prior to next year’s title/s, I think we could see it evolved further with the main series titles. The much more vibrant colour palette that I feel went missing after Gen V in favour of a washed out watercolour shaders is also on show in what we’ve seen with these games, so I hope those carry over too. Throw in a controllable camera and some of the stuff that we always want to see in a core series Pokémon game in next year’s title/s (a half decent narrative, some smart evolutions in gameplay and game design features added in previous game - looking at you, Totem Pokémon) and I won’t have much, if anything, to complain about come next year. I’ll remain optimistic until I have a genuine reason to become pessimistic, but as someone who was born at the peak of Pokémania, I’m just glad we might get some more people on-board for the next year’s games. I don’t think these games were an absolutely necessary stepping stone to draw people in, and I understand the distaste it might leave some fans with, but it’s Pokémon; I’m sure I’ll find some level of enjoyment in it, as I always have done.

Well, I’m in. We didn’t have Mario Kart on the Wii as kids (I know, shame on us), but Sonic and SEGA All Stars Racing more than made up for that, and me and my little brother and sister must have sunk hundreds of hours into the game over several summers.

While I’m sure that some resources were taken away from Gen VIII to make these games, I have my doubts that it was anything to the point of detriment. These games look like 3DS ports, or even, as @Dcubed has suggested before, mobile games. I won’t place any bets, but just looking at it, do you know when I think this game - with it being a RBGY reimagining, only having the original 151, etc. - was intended for? 2016. The 20th Anniversary. I have the genuine feeling that this is a shelved product, which has been worked on longer than we thought. I think the plan might have originally been to remake the original games for 3DS using the new engine (or, at the very least, as an in-house tech demo), but I think they shelved that to see how the world reacted to GO first - after all, that originally only catered to the original 151 too - and, more likely, also probably figured out that it would save them a lot of time and money to just put the old games out on Virtual Console. The Pokémon following you, the GO additions, etc., all seem like Pokémon GO pandering, and that’s exactly what it is - GO was a huge success, and so they’ve probably retrofitted a shelved game to make profit from that, or “phase new players to the franchise into the core series”, as I’m sure any PR team would spin it. USUM were made by the younger dev team because the older team probably had so much on their hands, juggling both the Gen VIII games and supposedly working with Niantic and some other devs (it wouldn’t surprise me if Nintendo’s first party teams got in to help on this, at all) on the game. I can understand the hot takes. And I can appreciate the genuine confusion about what this means for the future of the franchise. But do we really think that Game Freak are going to let the future of “real” core series games be inspired by the successes of GO? After they’ve so stubbornly stuck to the original formula for 22 years? I honestly doubt it. I think there’s reason for concern with this game, and whether or not this spin-off series becomes a mainstay for the franchise, but I’m not concerned at all by Gen VIII, and I don’t think that you should be, either. At the very least, just because the same leakers who were so right about LGPE were also adamant that these games would have a mixed/divisive reaction, and that the game/s really worth being excited about are coming next year, in 2019. Chin up, @Glen-i and co. who are worried about the future of the franchise. I think next year’s World Championships will shine a light on whether these really are to be considered core series titles or not.

@Sméagol (or a mod), might be a good idea to copy these tweets from my comment earlier this morning into the original post? It’s got everything that we officially know about the games. Might be a good idea to add the release date (November 16th), too

Pretty much where I’m at, though I do want to give the games a go, if anything just to have a better understanding of what TPC are going for with this exactly. Pokémon is great because it has a relatively low entry barrier but a high mastery barrier, so I’m struggling to see how this will entice GO players to make the switch to the main series games. Unless, of course, Let’s Go is going to become a spin-off series which is here to stay. Thank goodness that they’ve declared that this isn’t the game that they announced back at E3 last year, or the Internet might just have melted into a nervous breakdown. On the downside, with the knowledge that this game will have presumably been in production for at least three years by the time it releases, and with initial reception to Let’s Go proving somewhat divisive, at least amongst those whom seem to care most, I think we’re going to see more and more outlandish wishlists for Gen VIII. Which makes me worry that Game Freak has just put even more pressure on themselves to match fan expectations with the next main series title/s.

Some Q&A stuff going down. Now, this doesn’t bother me too much, seeing as it’s been rumoured for a while... ...but this does: Eh... UPDATE ...but then they say this and I get excited for a Dragon Eeveelution... YAY BOO This is a real emotional rollercoaster you’re putting me through, GF. After what I’ve heard about USUM, this is a very necessary clarification to make. So I guess I’m (very) excited for what next year’s Pokémon title will bring, because I’m kind of on the fence with LGEP right now. ...

Well, you won’t have to wait too long these tweets felt like they were sort of intended for you Honestly, I think I’m in on a return to Kanto. It probably helps that I haven’t played through the entire region in its original form in a very long time - the only time that I completed a journey through Kanto the save file got corrupted, and I haven’t really felt the urge to play the VC versions of the originals, despite owning them - but yeah, I think I’m ready to choose Bulbasaur again. While, of course, I’m waiting for Gen VIII proper to kick off next year one of the leakers that got this stuff right, including the timing of today’s reveal, did tease that we should be much more excited about next year’s game than this one, so I think we can remain (somewhat) hopeful that next year will bring the changes that we want to see.

Yeah, I think I’m in on Quest. Definitely seeing a lot of the negative reactions (seriously: why, Internet?), but I like how quirky it is; I think a lot of that wave of initial negative reactions is due to impatience over the Let’s Go titles. Anyways, it’ll hopefully keep me somewhat busy until I can get a Switch at the end of summer! As for the main games, I was expecting nothing more than Citra HD Gen VII graphics (not that there’s anything wrong with that, mind), so I was very surprised when the first images came through in the seconds before the trailer launched. There was definitely a moment of hesitancy with regards to the main character models, but I think the Pokémon models and environments look absolutely fantastic. And yep. Seriously, Nintendo are going all out in the final third by the looks of things, as they should be: Smash, Pokémon, and we still don’t know what exactly is going on with Yoshi, Fire Emblem or the recently rumoured Star Fox. The former two alone would be enough to cross the 20M units sold mark though, surely? Q&A session coming up, so we might find out some more morsels of information on the games shortly.

Pokémon Let’s Go Eevee and Pokémon Let’s Go Pikachu are official! Coming Friday 16th November! Worth noting that other core series Pokémon RPGs are set to be released in H2 2019, too. So, if this isn’t your cup of tea, don’t worry: it seems like Gen VIII proper will be on its way shortly! Going to try start trying to move the official Pokémon livetweets into this post regarding the Let’s Go titles so that all of the info pertaining to these games are in one place.

And so it begins...I think I’m just going to quote livetweets of the event as it unfurls, and I suppose some of my reactions to the news, just to save anyone having to search extensively for the livetweet feed in the morning/later on. Wait. Wait. What?! What the... Okay. This looks strange, but I’m actually somewhat interested. Also... That would explain the event’s length. Guys, I think I might be in on Pokémon Quest. Maybe. Let’s see what else they announce first...

I don’t want to get too hyped, because I’m actually pretty well armed for some disappointment right about now, but... And, speaking of the media event... UPDATE (01:38) AHHHHHHHHHH UPDATE 2 (01:41) I don’t know why, but seeing this in English makes it seem so much more tangible. I need to learn some Japanese...

Over 100,000 people currently watching a Twitch livestream of a Fallout bobblehead. A lot of talk seems to be about it being a huge deviation for the franchise. Could be a smart move for Bethesda to get this out of the way before E3 too, if that is the case. Looking at people’s reactions to what this might be (that is to say, supposedly, a hero shooter?) makes it seem potentially divisive, and I don’t think that they want much, if anything, to get in the way of their focuses at this year’s E3. Which, let’s be honest, is probably whatever BGS have been cooking up as of late (and a consequent deep dive), Doom 2, and some Prey DLC.

The more I think about it, the more I think that the Let’s Go! titles were probably going to be 3DS titles all along. They’ll probably be “enhanced” in the same way that we expected to see a potential Stars be “enhanced”...which means in the same engine, and not so “enhanced”. If those come this year, I think there’s a chance we see Gen VIII next year. This, I hope, is just to tide us over - and give the Switch a momentum boost - until next year, when the real differences will be seen with a new engine, region, Pokémon, etc., taking advantage of the Switch’s power.

Huh, that is odd. Sorry, I didn’t mean to potentially mislead anyone. I wasn’t aware of the SFAC pricing, nor Capcom tax seriously though, what’s up with us paying considerably more, at least when one considers current exchange rates? I know that the £ has been somewhat volatile since the Brexit vote, but still, it’s been on the rise as of late. At current exchange rates, we’d effectively be paying 50% more than them for SFAC at those price points definitely seems like Capcom taking advantage of the situation.