Sheikah Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 (edited) Also the logic behind the push for the vests was explained and a number of people credited the reasoning as sound. Now we know anyway that with that many Mafia it's pretty unlikely town won the most popular vest. vote Sheikah It's really bad how you do this. You should always explain. Edited March 20, 2013 by Sheikah Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 The way you tried to get info from Rummy was clumsily scummy, and really, chances are that you're mafia anyway. People should start voting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikah Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 The way you tried to get info from Rummy was clumsily scummy, and really, chances are that you're mafia anyway. People should start voting Except it wasn't. He's accusing me of something but is too coward to say what info it is or how he got it. If you're going to try lynch someone, you'd better have a reason. Looking at it from another angle, he is trying to do exactly what you're voting me for; extracting info from me without giving anything away himself. Anyway, unless there is any actual reason put forward to lynch me, I'm going to assume this is a lynch train. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 If you're going to wait for solid evidence in a game where over half of the players want to see everyone else dead, you're going to have trouble. Voting patterns are going to be very useful as I've said, and ignoring behaviour is a bad idea too. Right now you're the best bet, IMO. Two votes does not a train make Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikah Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 If you're going to wait for solid evidence in a game where over half of the players want to see everyone else dead, you're going to have trouble. Voting patterns are going to be very useful as I've said, and ignoring behaviour is a bad idea too. Right now you're the best bet, IMO. Two votes does not a train make 3 votes actually. And what are you saying then - lynch people based on no evidence at all? A faultless strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rummy Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Yeah, I'll keep hold on it for now; given the looks of the games I doubt you'll manage to kill me tonight. Just for everyone else, it's already in the thread - and it wasn't a positive thing. Keeping my vote on your Sheikah. Misquoting yourself, pretending that the vests reasoning was credited as sound - that wasn't how I saw it and don't forget - your mafia buddies will be working with you. Why you trying to sniff me out eh? *I* wasn't the one up to shenanigans last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 a train is defined by the number of people on it. I got suspicious info on you yesterday, Rummy is claiming the same, and I judge your behaviour to be scummy. Anyway, do some of the other players want to play the game? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikah Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Yeah, I'll keep hold on it for now; given the looks of the games I doubt you'll manage to kill me tonight. Just for everyone else, it's already in the thread - and it wasn't a positive thing. Keeping my vote on your Sheikah. Misquoting yourself, pretending that the vests reasoning was credited as sound - that wasn't how I saw it and don't forget - your mafia buddies will be working with you. Why you trying to sniff me out eh? *I* wasn't the one up to shenanigans last night. Misquoting myself as a reason, good lord. Paraphrasing then. And hero, Yvonne, Paul and I all at some point credited the strategy of collective voting, if you look back. Even if some of them eventually decided on not group voting, they still understood the concept whereas you do not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Yeah I don't think discussing group voting was a bad idea, but I think the strategy of RNG voting at the time was the best conclusion with the information available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikah Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 a train is defined by the number of people on it. I got suspicious info on you yesterday, Rummy is claiming the same, and I judge your behaviour to be scummy. Anyway, do some of the other players want to play the game? I find it suspicious that you coincidentally have suspicious info on me, yet no one seems able to present any such info to make a case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Being untargetable is scummy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rummy Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Well, why would I misquote myself if I was playing a mafia game? To make it look retrospectively like I was saying something else, or slightly different, to what I actually said. So yeah, it's not only a strange thing to do, but I find it suspicious. It's quite a good way of misleading people into believing something that didn't happen, did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikah Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Being untargetable is scummy. There's a contradiction here. For Rummy to have info on me he probably either targeted me or my target. But you say I'm untargetable, and my writeup clearly states no one else targeted my target. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diageo Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I want to hear the info Rummy has on Sheikah. It's clear Sheikah isn't gonna come out with it. Also, Yvonne, would you be willing to come out with your character? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I would not, but I will say I am from the Zelda universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Peterson Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 My guess is all 3 of Rummy, Yvonne, and Sheikah are Mafia, with the latter being on a separate team. They're definitely all scumnags in my opinion. @Yvonne, it can be hard for others to join in when Rummy, Sheikah, and yourself create pages of nothing... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Got anything to offer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rummy Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 @Shiekah, why not answer one of the following questions with something useful: 1. Why were you untargetable? 2. Who did you target? 3. What did you do to them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Peeps Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I don't really see anything tangible to go on. Rummy has alleged info on Sheikah which he won't reveal, Sheikah is not offering anything about what it might be. I have no information about anyone so I don't have anything to contribute to the discussion. Unless Rummy comes out with his info, there's nothing to say. I had no target last night. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 @The Peeps - got no power? Didn't send a target? Power/role is not night based? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DuD Posted March 20, 2013 Author Share Posted March 20, 2013 Vote update: Sheikah (3) : Rummy, Yvonne. Majority is 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonnas Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Rummy: I have something on you! Sheikah: Pics or it didn't happen! Yvonne: I have something too! Sheikah: No Comment! Yvonne: My something is actually the lack of something! Rummy: Yeah! So I dunno where we go from here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magnus Peterson Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 So, no-one has anything on me being ...well, date-raped as far as I can tell. That was meant as a question. There should be a '?'. A thousand apologies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yvonne Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 Y'all need to mind your glass houses, what other info is there? Speak up now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheikah Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 I know for sure there's a contradiction here, it's worth mentioning again. The person who I targeted was not targeted by anyone but me (I know this from my writeup) Therefore, if Yvonne is telling the truth in saying I was untargetable, then Rummy could not have gained info on me by targeting me, nor could he have targeted my target due to the info from my writeup. A few possibilities I see are: A) Yvonne is lying, and I was targetable (potential supporting information: I received no information about being protected, and Rummy claims to have info on me - which from my writeup, I would assume he received from targeting me) B) Yvonne was blocked rather than it being me who was untargetable. Yvonne hasn't considered this though for some reason. C) Rummy is lying (supporting info - he doesn't appear to want to reveal info on me and thus reveal his role - could be that he doesn't want to have to make up being a tracker and be caught out later on) D) Rummy received some info on me through some kind of other ability that doesn't involve targeting me or my target, but this seems like a weak thing to go on to try lynch somebody. E) They're all lying. :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts