Jump to content
N-Europe

Opinions on spec for a new pc


highland man

Recommended Posts

This is the spec for the pc i am hoping to get this Christmas and i would appreciate some opinions from the technical minded people out there.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Intel Pentium 4 processor 650 (3.4GHz, 2MB cache, 800MHz) supporting Hyper-Threading Technology

 

Microsoft Windows XP Home Edition

 

Intel 915P chipset motherboard with PCI Express, 1Gb LAN, dual channel DDR & Hyper-Threading support

 

1GB DDR2 533

 

250GB Serial ATA hard drive with 8MB buffer

 

256Mb ATI Radeon X800GT PCI Express graphics

 

19" Viewsonic VX912 pure digital DVI TFT monitor (12ms response)

 

DVD-ROM (16x) drive

 

Multi Format Dual Layer DVD Writer (16x) / CD Writer drive

 

Sound Blaster compatible 6 channel audio

 

Creative Inspire P5800 5.1 speakers

 

Microsoft cordless keyboard and cordless optical tilt mouse

 

v92 56k modem

 

Xpider tool free case (453x222x495mm)

 

HCI 5 star Bundle Desktop

 

 

i've attached a pic also

 

The whole pc and screen will cost me £800

 

Thanks again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looks like a very good spec to me...

 

Uber fast P4, plenty of RAM, fast hard disk, powerful graphics, decent monitor, and the rest looks good too. £800 seems like a pretty good deal.

 

Only thing I'd moan about is the on-board sound, because I'm obsessed with audio quality. If you want to get the most out of those speakers, consider a better sound card - I reccommend either an Audigy2 ZS (£40) or X-Fi (£100).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmmm... the X800GT is the worst version of the X800. Its really not going to last you that long and to be honest its not going to keep up with the CPU. The X1800 will be out soon, huge amounts of power and the 7800GTX (GeForce) is already out and its not that expensive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A mate of mine has an x800 (AGP version) and it's fantastic, can't go wrong with that chip.

 

Edit: the GT is a cheaper version of the x800. It might be possible to softmod it to higher speeds and unlock some pipelines to get more out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It maybe be a huge leap (and yes it damn well is, even MP3's and normal sounds... sound even better.) but are you really willing to pay £150 for one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On an slightly off topic note, can some one explain to me how crossfire works. What card is the master etc. Looking at the product specs on overclockers.co.uk it goes on about the new cards needing a master one to function in crossfire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why do you need two DVD drives?

 

The graphics card isn't too bad, but if you can, swap it out for an X800XL, it will cost pennies more but will be much better.

 

JonSt, don't worry about CrossFire, it's the poor cousin of nVIDIA's SLI, and honestly isn't worth pursuing under ANY circmustances in its current state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have bought an extra sound card; but that's up to you. I use my onboard sound, and my speakers are awesome.

 

My secret? Optical out. Doesn't matter how dirty and sux the analogue circutry is, my sound is crisp and pure since my speakers have a built in decoder for almost everything. They rock.

 

For reference my speakers are Logitech Z-680's, and anyone who has met me and witnessed them will tell you that they want them.

 

Infact from: http://www.bit-tech.net/review/266/5 that page:

 

Pros:

All around amazing sound quality.

Decoder/Control console unit gives you full control and input options.

Remote Control is a huge plus, especially when using these as a home theatre configuration.

Design of the satellites make them versitile and easy to install.

 

Cons:

Price (expensive but worth it)

Made the UPS man mad at me, because of their weight, you could pay big money for shipping.

 

Hehe, same happened to me, the guy from City Link made me carry out of the back of his van myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read that the pentiums are slower than the Athlon 64's and they run hotter. The X800 GT is a mid range card to compete with the Nvidia 6600 GT and it does run fine at around 1280x as long as you have a good CPU if you want something slightly more expensive and if it's available there's always the X800 (non Pro) which I think is only slower in terms of Core speed and Memory Speed. DDR 2 I've heard is poor and not a big advantage over normal DDR.

I know all this because I've been researching on a new PC aswell :p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've read that the pentiums are slower than the Athlon 64's and they run hotter. The X800 GT is a mid range card to compete with the Nvidia 6600 GT and it does run fine at around 1280x as long as you have a good CPU if you want something slightly more expensive and if it's available there's always the X800 (non Pro) which I think is only slower in terms of Core speed and Memory Speed.

I know all this because I've been researching on a new PC aswell :p

 

You could have just asked us, or at least me.

 

Yeah, Prescotts suck, and Athlon 64's are by the fastest CPUs at gaming. The Pentium 4 could beat the Athlon 64 in certain things, like video encoding. Uh, until they released the Athlon 64 X2, which is by far the best single CPU system you could purchase.

 

X800XL is the best price/performance X800 series card. X800 Pro and X800 don't have the same number of pipelines as the X800 XT. The X800 XL has the same number of pipelines as the X800 XT, but often costs less than the X800 Pro. It's the better buy. Seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Offerman

The P4 - Athlon war has been raging for ages, and it was pretty tight, until the X2 was released. Its now a landslide and even the P4 Extreme Edition, (which admittedly has fizzled out) cannot come close to the processing ability of the Athlon 64 X2.

 

The tables have also turned for heat disippation. The Intel P4 Northwood came out when AMD launched their XP series in 2001. The P4 had only one core with one codename, the Northwood, AMD however had the Palomino, the T-Bred, and the Barton. All three suffered from heat problems, even the Barton, which was made to combat these problems. As such the early P4's where still favoured because of that.

 

However as 2004 came around, Intel launched the Prescott and as Piro says its a dog. It drinks power, and is horribly dirty and inefficent. AMD's 64 Bit processers absolutly eat it up, and surprisingly AMD's on-the-fly load throttleing doesnt account for all of its efficency. Alot of work and RnD on the die side of things has ensured that AMD stay well ahead for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...