ShadowV7 Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 Ha nice comparison there Diemetrix.Hope Red Steel gets a big crowd.
guarana Posted April 15, 2006 Author Posted April 15, 2006 Cool SONY: SO lets take a look at the GFX. IT's simpley amazing. This is revolutionary in many ways. Microsoft: Sony showed you whats look like a greate game. To bad it dosen't look as good as the games on our console. We are taking a step in the right direction. Better GFX and Xbox live. Nintendo: Look at the way it changes the way we play and involve our self with games forever. exactly... if Red Steel only looked half as good , it would still make a better impression then Gow or MGS4 at e3 because how its played .... i think people are STARVING for inovation , and NEW gameplay (ds is proof, if this were not true , psp would be sold out ;not ds )... Gow and MGS4 will look AMAZING , but playing them will feel OUTDATED... Red Steel will look amazing, and play AMAZING!
dabookerman Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 playing a metal gear game never feels outdated.
Nintendork Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 You just can't compare Red Steel to either God of War or Metal Gear Solid.. Metal gear has earnt it's status as one of the best games ever. The same applies for God of War.. Like Bookerman said, we don't know much about it yet, even a control scheme can't make a freaking game. It's good but not godly.. and doesn't deserve to be compared to one until it has earnt it.
ShadowV7 Posted April 15, 2006 Posted April 15, 2006 Control Scheme won't totally make the game but it will help show how good it is,you can't really compare them all because in their own rights are all different.And each game will play different.Will be harder for Red Steel because of Metal Gear because it's got such great games.
guarana Posted April 16, 2006 Author Posted April 16, 2006 I find the metal gear solid game play mechanics to be more outdated then most other games the game is mostly played at a overhead view like 2d zelda games and the original metal gears for nes are played ... every boss fight feels like a chore instead of being fun ... Fighting ocelot in mgs 1 for the first time in the room rigged up with c4 ....beating this battle meant you run in a circle over and over and over , shoting occasionally (everyone remembers this fight) ...it was a lame fight and i thought mgs 2 and 3 wouldnt share the same lameness in its boss fights and controls....(but they are exactly the same) Now think about when your fighting ocelot as a boss for the first time in mgs3 , you shoot him , he shoots you , back and forth , back and forth , theres nothing else to do besides that .... i could win most boss fights , just standing in one spot, eating rations all day ... all MGS's are , are just super long movies,with great storylines , and amazing graphics.. i find the controls in ever mgs to be terrible , but that doesnt stop me from buying every one...
BigTac Posted April 16, 2006 Posted April 16, 2006 Not sure if its been mentioned anywhere but Red Steel is to sit alongside MGS4 and Gears of War at E3 http://www.gamespot.com/news/6147699.html Speaking on this, both Nintendo and Ubisoft know that this will be big at E3. Having Red Steel, Gears of Wars, MGS4 in one session creates the perfect situation for Ubisoft using Nintendo's strategy to show that even thought Red Steel is behind graphically it's ahead in controlability. For Nintendo, E3 will be the place to prove to the public that what they have done is the best road to take. It maybe be a one shot thing for Nintendo but as the have done with the DS, I believe they will do it once again with their new home console. But only this time they will have a much better software lineup from launch unlike the DS.
FalcoLombardi Posted April 16, 2006 Posted April 16, 2006 That session is like a big fat giant orgy. Yay! That makes me:yay:
system_error Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 New pictures? http://ranobe.sakuratan.com/up/src/up100970.jpg
Gaijin von Snikbah Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 New pictures? http://ranobe.sakuratan.com/up/src/up100970.jpg They have the same aiming cursor, and asian looking tattoos. It could be real.
Nintendork Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 Look legit to me. Who says they're final versions? Nobody.. they have to work on an engine before the work on the graphics. I call alpha version leak. What satisfaction does anyone get from making such a shoddy fake? None,,
mario_jr Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 Look legit to me.Who says they're final versions? Nobody.. they have to work on an engine before the work on the graphics. I call alpha version leak. What satisfaction does anyone get from making such a shoddy fake? None,, Probably the same satisfaction as the person who made Nintendo ON
pedrocasilva Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 I don't think they're fake I recall seeying them in the magazine, in the "small places" around the "big images", I think they came from there.
ShadowV7 Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 The images look really bad there,kinda 'fuzzy' looking.Why would the release alpha versions when they've already released nearly finshed shots? Lighting is bad aswell.I don't care if they are fake or not,i've sen the first batch and that will keep me going.
pedrocasilva Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 ^ but they were mixed in the first batch, they didn't release these aftwerwards, maybe the "in-game" they reffered to is this one too... proof:
Nintendork Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 Probably the same satisfaction as the person who made Nintendo ONErr no, slight difference is Nintendo ON was a health and safety risk.Put a mask over your head and go run around your room- yeah great fucking idea. This however isn't so ludicrous.. because it isn't proposing that it can read your brain. It's just a screenshot.. and you guys are acting all defensive because it doesn't look so great. All games have to start somewhere.
Gaijin von Snikbah Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 What do you know. They look even more real now.
ShadowV7 Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 They are better but it's still not as good compared to the others,video footage is needed.Cmon E3
McMad Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 How are they not as good compared to the others, it's just because the screens have been shrunk that you can't see all the detail in the pics.
dabookerman Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 hahaha you guys make me laugh, NO THEY ARE FAKE proof is shown No ok, they dont look so bad...
ShadowV7 Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 They look a bit better but the one with the sword and the guy look's blotchy.The ones system_error posted look bad but the ones pedrocasilva posted look better.Oh well.
Stabby Posted April 17, 2006 Posted April 17, 2006 Still looks just a little better than Xbox but I don't really care. It even has more advantages than disadvantages: smaller, low-power, cheaper, easy and fast to make games... Graphics are a lot more important on the artistic side really. Gamecube and PS2 have proven that to me. Graphics don't need to come close to reality. If that's what you want, then I'm affraid you have forgotten the true essence of gaming just as many others have.
Recommended Posts