Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 (not mine) I wonder how long until they close the ubi thread lol
Tellyn Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 (not mine) I wonder how long until they close the ubi thread lol Is that NGamer's Matthew Castle sat next to Miyamoto?!
Blue_Ninja0 Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Caporegime I'm ashamed of you! I expect other people not to know what the Seal of Quality after all these years of having it explained in their faces, but you? *gasp*It's what Emasher said, companies of old, after the atari crash didn't test their games, the seal of quality pretty much saved the industry, because people didn't want to buy another incredible horrible port of frogger (it was much worse than it is now with ports) that didn't work, so Nintendo vouched that it actually worked. The Quality refered to that not to the awesomeness of the game. Nowadays, every company tests their games, so it's pointless, moreover, if they're licensed, they work. Don't make me go all Zelda on yo' ass!!! THAT'S WHY I said: You know what? The Nintendo Seal of Quality present in every game released on a Nintendo console should be more demanding. Nintendo should not accept shameful attempts like this and many others present in the industry. In the sense of: They shouldn't accept all shameful projects to ship on their consoles and be more restrict. With all due respect my Don, but you're not completely right. I know for a fact that Nintendo can refuse to allow, for example, a pornography game on the console. And if it would be released through illegal ways, it would obviously not be blessed by the seal.
Tellyn Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Right, to whoever's doing these emails: [email protected] I'll inquire with Tom about writing a feature about the shit Ubisoft are giving Nintendo gamers.
Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 In the sense of: They shouldn't accept all shameful projects to ship on their consoles and be more restrict. With all due respect my Don, but you're not completely right. I know for a fact that Nintendo can refuse to allow, for example, a pornography game on the console. And if it would be released through illegal ways, it would obviously not be blessed by the seal. They can refuse to accept whathever they want, that's why games need to be licensed, but it's a free market, so they can't just turn down games they don't like, specially if they come from a big company.
Blue_Ninja0 Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 They can refuse to accept whathever they want, that's why games need to be licensed, but it's a free market, so they can't just turn down games they don't like, specially if they come from a big company. Of course, but sometimes it feels they just deserve to be turned down. Like this one.
Calza Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 lol @ this thread. Ubisoft want to make money. Nintendo want to make money. They do not care about any of resentment towards "casual games" because you opinion does not make a difference to them or the "casual gamers".
Pit-Jr Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Ironically this thread is turning into a babiez party. And whoever conceived that email should be on the cover.
Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 lol @ this thread. Ubisoft want to make money. Nintendo want to make money. They do not care about any of resentment towards "casual games" because you opinion does not make a difference to them or the "casual gamers". lol @ not reading sensible posts and in turn not posting sensible posts.
Shino Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Lol at the people who think owning an 360 makes them more valid than us.
pedrocasilva Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 oh god, the X360 trolls arrived (we're-impartially-against-anything-to-do-with-nintendo guys). Good games, it's all there is to it; and ubi ones are utter absolute crap. lol at this thread indeed. I'd be insulted as a gamer, even if I still was in PSone era by seeing such graphics and attempts, hell, pong era. And problem is... this is not ninjabread man developer whose name I don't even know without checking... this is ubisoft, they guys who promised the world for the Wii and delivered great mighty poo. Their loss too, but "loling" at that, only if that's loling in pity for Ubi and how low they've fallen.
Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 I have a 360 and I say your post holds no ground. Who are you talking too though? lol
Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Ah, was for Shino, perdro got in before me Still can't make any sense out of it, unless you're being sarcastic. I don't know it's hard to tell, the internet is a mess nowadays!I'm gonna go with the sarcasm though, taking in account that you're awesome :P Shino is saying that there are people that think they have some sort of moral and perspective high ground because they own a 360. And there are, it doesn't mean it's everyone. I have a 360 and that's not why I have a moral and perspective high ground, it's because I absorb the abilities of my dead enemies thus perfecting an already near perfect existance. lol Also, long live Ninjabread Man.
Tellyn Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 lol @ this thread. Ubisoft want to make money. Nintendo want to make money. They do not care about any of resentment towards "casual games" because you opinion does not make a difference to them or the "casual gamers". Ironically this thread is turning into a babiez party. And whoever conceived that email should be on the cover. You guys probably don't like the Wii anyway, so imagine this. Ubisoft give up on Rainbox Six, Tom Clancy's franchises, Far Cry, Prince of Persia, and (theoretically) cancel the 360/PS3 releases of Beyond Good and Evil 2 in favour of making Petz and other casual games. Would you be happy? Is there anything at all wrong with wanting quality games that we actually want to play on the Wii? I don't see why console preference means you should feel superior to us. If the boot was on the other foot, you wouldn't be at all happy.
Shino Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Ah, was for Shino, perdro got in before me It was aimed at people described in my post, and apparently you're not one of them. Some users come here from the Other Consoles forum to patronizes us, I can't be the only one to notice this.
ShadowV7 Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 I was being what Shino mentioned about 360 folk,then I was stating that since me owning a 360 gives me more perspective so I was 'dismissing' his post as invalid Seems I failed at it though ¬_¬
Tellyn Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 It was aimed at people described in my post, and apparently you're not one of them. Some users come here from the Other Consoles forum to patronizes us, I can't be the only one to notice this. You're completely right. It never works the other way though with those people, does it?
Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 I was being what Shino mentioned about 360 folk,then I was stating that since me owning a 360 gives me more perspective so I was 'dismissing' his post as invalid Seems I failed at it though ¬_¬ Don't worry, I got ya :P A little late, but I got ya.
ShadowV7 Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Better late than never :p But yea, agree with you Shino, I think alot of people see it though, They are more 'hardcore' than us though. With their FPS' and all.
Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 It was aimed at people described in my post, and apparently you're not one of them. Some users come here from the Other Consoles forum to patronizes us, I can't be the only one to notice this. Tbh most fleshed out discussions have become like this, the folks that live on "other consoles" obviously don't like the Wii (most likely disgruntled Nintendo fanboys that want Nintendo to be Microsoft or Sony) and come here and make a mess out of every thread and then they say they're sick of this place because it's filled with fanboys, when most fanboys, trolls and extreme comments come from them. Oh well, it's still good fun. Let's not dwell on this and let's keep making fun of Ubisoft.
Guest Stefkov Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 It was aimed at people described in my post, and apparently you're not one of them. Some users come here from the Other Consoles forum to patronizes us, I can't be the only one to notice this. If you mean me then yes. I see a game like this and I can't help but laugh. Laugh, that you all want these better looking games when you know, all companies want is moneh. You can't say they're not just out for the moneh, otherwise they wouldn't be making such a game as 'Babies Party'. Actually I take that back, it'll make thousands. I forgot how many paedophiles there are in this world. Paedophiles and infertile women. But I still like Nintendo and their games. I just can't stand seeing people defend other games that are actually shite, like really really shite but they can't admit.
Hellfire Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 If you mean me then yes. I see a game like this and I can't help but laugh. Laugh, that you all want these better looking games when you know, all companies want is moneh. You can't say they're not just out for the moneh, otherwise they wouldn't be making such a game as 'Babies Party'. Actually I take that back, it'll make thousands. I forgot how many paedophiles there are in this world. Paedophiles and infertile women. I can't really make sense of this.
Calza Posted May 31, 2008 Posted May 31, 2008 Sigh. I don't see why you are complaining. This game isn't being developed for you so why get so worked up about it. Fair enough if it was Nintendo's highly anticipated new IP but its not. Yeah I don't have a Wii but that doesn't mean I don't want one. There are more than enough solid games by Nintendo and 3rd parties and I don't see the point in getting worked up over such a game.
Recommended Posts