Batman: The Dark Knight discussion

[Paj!]

Seriously? Whats the point in that? Batman begins leaves everything perfect as a prequel ie the mansion burning down

 

Yeah, you were just owned.

 

How could Dark Knight be a prequel with a white (he's black in the early Burton films, before inexplicably turning white in the better-left-alone Joel S. films) Harvey Dent running for Mayor, and Joker allready becoming Joker, when he becomes Joker in Batman 1989..?

 

I think someone else needs to take the "d-u-h" test or whatever you said.

[LegoMan1031]

I was always under the impression that Batman Begins was just like a reboot of the franchise, like how Casino Royale was for James Bond. And future films are just following on from that.

[Calza]

Yeah Batman Begins wasn't a new beginning as in a prequel but as in a new beginning as a new franchise.

 

And the less that is spoke about Batman Forever and Batman and Robin the better.

[LegoMan1031]

lol, i think that is why they decided to re-start the franchise because of 'them' films...

 

Really looking forward to The Dark Knight!

[Solo]

Batman Forever was a good laugh and Val Kilmer was a great.

[Paj!]

Yeah, Batman Forever was actually pretty cool, in that the style Schumacher used wasn't silly...

 

Batman And Robin was ridiculous though.

[Solo]

Yeah I suppose it depends what age you were when you first saw it. I think I was about 10 or 11 when I saw it at the cinema so of course I would have loved it. Haven't seen it a a long while though.

[Paj!]

Yeah I suppose it depends what age you were when you first saw it. I think I was about 10 or 11 when I saw it at the cinema so of course I would have loved it. Haven't seen it a a long while though.

 

I was 5/6 when I saw "..And Robin" and of course thought it was the best thing ever, which just shows how childish it was, as evidenced by rewatching it was as someone who can make real judgements.