ipaul Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 I've heard it's somewhat lax with accurate historical interpretation. A gross falsification. Just thought I'd throw that out there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The fish Posted February 1, 2011 Share Posted February 1, 2011 I've heard it's somewhat lax with accurate historical interpretation. A gross falsification. Just thought I'd throw that out there. Knew it already. As randomly ahistorical as it is, for the most part it doesn't really matter to the story. I think, if anything, it's to make it a tad more accessible to the wider world - Winston Churchill is a character pretty much everyone in the English speaking world knows already, as is Heir Hitler as an antagonist/approaching evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxigen_Waste Posted February 15, 2011 Share Posted February 15, 2011 Just seen it. It was good, won't deny that. But I didn't really like because Bertie was a douche. The man didn't even write his own speeches, for christ's sake! He was a tool and completely undeserving of the prestige he's usually remembered for. Bah. 7/10. Geoffrey Rush = win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts