Yvonne

Come on now, we're playing a game

OK, cool. When I get home I'm going to compile a list of what I know about the characters so far, and maybe claimed actions. Diagrams and shit yo

I am focusing on the fact of whether or not players are new names or old. It makes people commit to statements and could potentially lead to patterns and further discussion*. *discussion, definition: A conversation that may take place in both lower and upper case. Aye Sprout! What I'm thinking is that there are only a few characters from the previous games around, and they may have something in common...

So ANYWAY the important thing is how many are old and how many are new. It's a theory innit

@Rummy, well the info is out now, however it came out. Now let's do something with it

Oh yeah, that's true! OK well how about a role call. People say whether their character is new or not. Not a whole bunch of information, but enough to have something to talk about, and not too painful to give away. Extra suspicion for those that abstain. I'll start - mine is new, though in a way related to an existing character.

A question for all who have been paying attention: are all the names from old Gentlemens mafia games? Are there any new ones? If so, how many of each?

First I would kill someone random, then someone who was threatening. That is not merely a function of who they are - it includes their perceived power, any claims, post count, what they're asking, what relationship they have with other players. Plus killing off the best players first encourages poor play

I think it's a bit unfair to assume good players being alive on D3 are mafia. Look at who's dead - lot of good players in this game. That said, I haven't yet read the arguments against ReZ.

"Funny that you are active after I mentioned you by name". I'm not going to give that any time.

I'll mention this now, and it can apply to all future instances; I will not offer any response to this type of reasoning, unless I feel that in a particular instance, there is value in it. Assume that if I ignore it, it is intentional.

Like double bluffing for example?

Who knows indeed. It's been a busy few days, so I want to respond to anything addressed to me until I have time to get stuck in. Looks like you've been making good progress getting information out though.

@Rummy what is your suspicion of me based on? Is it that I have been quiet the last couple of IRL days?

@The_Peeps I have a soft spot for puns! You're up

I mean, I worked this out ages ago

afaik: DuD Yvonne The Peeps correct me if mistake!

was that meant to be tricking or tracking? If there's one of those "count the number of mafia on a train" powers...I dunno. Always found it OP.

Yvonne represent! OK maybe we should sort that list and interrogate from quietest

@The Peeps top 5 suspects? I'm going to post mine later, need to collect my thoughts (I'm still at work)

No point voting for animal I think, it would be a waste of a townie. Since we've got a long day, why don't we collect what we know and start putting out some sus lists?

The passive crow caws twice only, but the worms will rise if it rains. Heartened, I think back to my youth. You have the dossier?

Aye, I noticed that too. Could be some team with no out-of-thread means of communication establishing some stuff?

What points to Langley? My PM states it was a "vicious hound".