Serebii

Lookie what I've done http://www.serebii.net/rumbleu/figures/series1.shtml http://www.serebii.net/rumbleu/figures/promo.shtml

Yeah, I think I'll wait and see what extras it has. Plus, I worry I'll instinctively shake when I want to roll due to the Wii version. With NSMB2, I almost broke my 3DS XL because I instinctively shook it to get extra lift in a jump lol

Wow, that was fast. I don't know if I want to get it or not. I had good fun with the Wii game but, I had fun with the Wii game...which is in my collection

March 28th

To make things worse, there's a special bonus figure. 1800Yen gets you the game and this figure. Punchy Pikachu

Has been confirmed

Blame my translator :p Of course you can

That was a misinterpretation by me. My translator said "The figures can be used in other games". He meant other people's Rumble U games. Surprised that got picked up on, it was up for less than a minute

First trailer

From the press release Implying the stress ball may not be GAME exclusive? Glow in the dark seems cool

The game is using the GamePad for other, better, functions though.

I was referring to the hyperbolic statement that you have to wait 1 minute for each cutscene

From what I've read, the loading times are not that bad

The Metro review complained about low tech visuals

Can you imagine the complaints about graphics with that? Already some places are complaining at "low tech visuals". Of course it's low tech, it's bloody lego

It's mostly that I have a technological background and the jury are less likely too, as seen with the Apple VS Samsung case where half of them didn't even know what patents were.

Nintendo lost the 3DS screen case, in a thing that baffles the hell out of me http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/13/4100924/nintendo-guilty-of-patent-infringement-3ds-technology Three things 1. I read the patent and overall it doesn't really match the 3DS's screen. The patent seems to be based upon using cameras 2. Sharp are the developers and manufacturers of the screen, so why go for Nintendo? 3. Why the hell did a jury decide? It's incredibly unlikely that they'd have the technical knowledge to assess whether or not it is infringing It really seems like this is the jury siding with the man against the big corporation, as often happens. Doesn't help that the man unfortunately had a stroke. I hope Nintendo get through the appeal

At least there was a Nintendo Direct Unlike Pachter's predictions which are just ridiculous

Someone on GAF brought up a good point. Monster Hunter 4 was originally due for release around now, so the whole thing is strategically valid for Sony to have tried to take steam out of it.

And yet it's so true :p

Vita 63,581 3DS LL 39,801 3DS 21,207 PS3 19,567 PSP 18,023 Wii U 9,454 Wii 1,363 Xbox 360 738 The Vita actually beat the 3DS this week, mostly due to the release of Soul Sacrifice and Tales of Hearts R

It would seem so. I'm disappointed

Yeah, I'm 95% sure that's what they're doing anyway

Just needed to make it clear since I've been seeing it on Kotaku and Eurogamer

Can I just remind you all that main series director, Junichi Masuda, is firmly against forcing kids to pay for extra stuff just to get more Pokémon in their games. As such, we'll not see paid DLC for main games, nor will we see figures for main games