Serebii

I was being sarcastic with my post, yes. However, complaining that a sequel looks like its predecessor and thus must be a remake, that is closer to trolling I do apologise if offence is gained, or if I have ruffled a few feathers, but I have seen many asinine statements today regarding these reveals (not here, on other places), and it has got me to the point of every single possible variation of me in every single possible parallel universe all facepalming simultaneously

Levels don't look alike but sure, remake over sequel. Makes sense

The exception to the rule. I serious cannot stand turn-based RPGs, but I love Pokémon. So sue me :p

I wasn't going to get this, mostly because I cannot stand turn-based RPG (even though this isn't really much of one), but the stuff shown today has convinced me

I maintain, if Nintendo had revealed a new IP, let's go with "Harry the Radioactive Hamster" (an idea I had when I was 6), people would just respond with "What the hell is this? Where's my Zelda/Metroid/Starfox/F-Zero/Steel Diver"

I used the translated name to make the point -_- The Japanese name is ゼルダの伝説 神々のトライフォース2

It's called Link to the Past 2. That's the subtitle Japan used, ergo sequel, not alternate timeline

It looks brilliant in the 3D video on the eShop

This was a 3DS Direct. Why are people complaining about lack of Wii U stuff? -_-

Since 2006, Nintendo have created numerous new IPs Unless they're working on Yoshi's Safari U, the next Mario First Person Shooter :p

You think that until you see a game where you're pushing a giant boulder made out of thousands of Luigi onto an enemy I do agree about a Metroid, F-Zero and Starfox game being needed, but F-Zero's sales were dwindling with the GBA ones so they decided to take a break. I'm certain we'll see at least one of those games at E3

I think much of it will change, that they just base it on it. Much like when you return to Kanto in HGSS from FRLG...but moreso

Because, unfortunately, that's how the market is these days. While hardcore fans whine about the "lack" of new IPs (I put it in speechmarks because it's absolute bollocks, since they have done like a dozen new IPs in the last two years), the actual consumer base want Mario. It doesn't confine them, else why would Mario be so adaptable to all these different genres?

Basically all the new crazy gameplay elements shown in that video. Seriously, why must a game be a new IP? New IPs seldom sell, that's why Nintendo have been relegating them to eShop to build up momentum, rather than losing money. I really don't get the people complaining, it makes no sense to.

Seriously? People are bitching that the games are "franchise" games? Take the new elements in Mario & Luigi, would those really be better in a completely different game? You say Nintendo are useless? They're putting their creative ideas into their franchises so that people will actually spot them. Making a new IP for the sake of a new IP is NOT the way to go. I don't get people sometimes, I really don't

So many are because it's 2D, and a "rehash" -_- I hate the internet at times That's what I had read, yeah. Checking for authenticity/

Because they said so this time, not me estimating :p

I believe it was said in the NOA one that they'll be bringing the Wii U information in a load like this at E3

They'll bring it with the Wii U at E3

Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past 2 coming for 3DS in 2014 in Japan, Winter 2013 for the US

This week in Japan 3DS LL 28,139 3DS 18,584 Vita 14,112 PS3 14,039 Wii U 9,984 PSP 7,566 Wii 1,383 Xbox 360 492

It's incredibly unlikely to have a remake of Majora's Mask and a remake of Wind Waker in the same year

Have you found all 5 ? Blocks and all 5 Starmen?

Na, the official twitter confirmed this morning that the Wii U update is next week

Yeah, I don't see another Meloetta event coming before XY is out