Mokong Posted April 2, 2006 Posted April 2, 2006 According to The Star it is Beast? I hope this is a bad case of poor research and not one of those things that differs from the comics and movies. They've already indicated in the first film that Wolverine is fairly old due to his healing power, so making Beast his father would make no sense unless they go and add healing powers to Beasts character which would be very very wrong
Platty Posted April 2, 2006 Posted April 2, 2006 Yeah that pretty much sucks arse and im sure it's not true.
Meik Posted April 2, 2006 Posted April 2, 2006 According to The Star I think that's the problem right there. To answer the topic: The story of Wolverine's childhood was told in the limited series Origin. He was born James Howlett, the son of wealthy Canadians John and Elizabeth Howlett in 19th century Alberta. He was a sickly youth, therefore his father hired a girl named Rose to take care of him. They were joined by a third youth, Dog Logan, who would later become James' bitter enemy.So there we go. Beast being Wolverine's father is retarded, even for The Star.
Guest Jordan Posted April 2, 2006 Posted April 2, 2006 Jeeze, even I knew that and i'm not even that big of a fan.
Mokong Posted April 2, 2006 Author Posted April 2, 2006 Erm...i didn't mean the question to be taken serious, it was meant to be more a rethorical (sp?) thing, i'm an x-man fan myself, Wolverine is my fav character, i just seen this and thought it would be funny to point out the stupidity of tabloid press:woops:
Recommended Posts