Oxigen_Waste Posted March 2, 2011 Author Share Posted March 2, 2011 Nor did I accuse him of doing so, since I've read that theory, too, but I also believe I've explicitly read somewhere that it wasn't the case. Yeah, it doesn't really prove it either way, but the official explanation from Disney sounds more like what I've heard: That as the story took shape and deviated from the original fairytale (which the inclusion of Flynn Rider was part of, obviously), they decided to change the title to something more fitting since it wasn't really the classic tale about "Rapunzel" any more. But we'll probably never know for sure. Never trust Disney, they're evil! Really! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Let's clear this up once and for all; Shrek is nothing more than shite toilet humour. Its entertaining yes but its far removed from the boundaries of 'good cinema'. Says you.. Never trust Disney, they're evil! Really! All big corporations are evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxigen_Waste Posted March 2, 2011 Author Share Posted March 2, 2011 All big corporations are evil. Not like Disney. Usually they're just greedy. Disney is actually really evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paj! Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 I LOVE DISNEY Y'ALL'RE JUST CYNICAL EMBRACE THE MAGIC *vacant stare* Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ashley Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Says you.. Yes. That is how speech works Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dannyboy-the-Dane Posted March 2, 2011 Share Posted March 2, 2011 Yes. That is how speech works Joke get FAIL! :p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts