Posted August 16, 2007 7.9 but not many deadhttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6948888.stm Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 16, 2007 You seem almost disappointed that the death toll isn't higher Don't you think nearly 500 people is a lot? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 16, 2007 You seem almost disappointed that the death toll isn't higher Don't you think nearly 500 people is a lot? Taking in the magnitude of the Earth Quake in a more dense populated area he has a poiint it could of been more.... And your are pretty much taking his words in the context of which he didn't mean it to be which is pretty un-fair 500 Compared to other Earthquakes we have seen and heard of over time is a relativly small death toll... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 16, 2007 Taking in the magnitude of the Earth Quake in a more dense populated area he has a poiint it could of been more.... And your are pretty much taking his words in the context of which he didn't mean it to be which is pretty un-fair 500 Compared to other Earthquakes we have seen and heard of over time is a relativly small death toll... Why compare it to others? 500 people are dead, thats alot of people. Pretty bad. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 16, 2007 %00 dead is horrific. About 1500 injured as well. Awful. Just awful. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 16, 2007 Why compare it to others? 500 people are dead, thats alot of people. Pretty bad. I Know It is, I am not denying that Still think his words have been taken in the wrong light Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 17, 2007 considering 3000,000 died in the asian tsunami Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Posted August 19, 2007 3,000,000? really? knock a 0 off Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
