pedrocasilva Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 I don't care as long as they have booth "Babes for All" too. Still it seems to me they are just killing E3 slowly and painfully. the "expo was too big" is a mouthful, just invest less into it, I didn't see EA getting that big space in E3 and it still leads software sales. I don't know what the real reasons were though, but it would be better left as is (or was). Besides... it was even good for tourism, with so many guys coming abroad. I was pretty good for business, now it may not worth it.
Stocka Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 CES starts tommorow in US. Hopefully shows like this will reveal much more now that E3 has flattened. GDC will most likely be a lot bigger when it comes februaryish
fanman Posted January 7, 2007 Posted January 7, 2007 I don't care as long as they have booth "Babes for All" too. Still it seems to me they are just killing E3 slowly and painfully. the "expo was too big" is a mouthful, just invest less into it, I didn't see EA getting that big space in E3 and it still leads software sales. I don't know what the real reasons were though, but it would be better left as is (or was). Besides... it was even good for tourism, with so many guys coming abroad. I was pretty good for business, now it may not worth it. They thought they were spending more than they got back specifically from it.
solitanze Posted January 8, 2007 Posted January 8, 2007 A babes conference would perform considerably better than the actual games conference. Expect to have a variety of females, from short to very tall, thin, meatier, petite, voluptuous, man chest, soccer ball chest, high voice, seductive voice, elegant clothing, revealing clothing, birthday suit, long hair short hair, white skin, coloured skin (as in brown or even having body art), you get the idea.
Recommended Posts