Jump to content
N-Europe

Rummy

Moderators
  • Posts

    16487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Rummy

  1. Laandaaaan
  2. Merry birthday to you
  3. I don't hate it, I'm just amazed I managed to overlook such a significant thing.
  4. Who's the player that can investigate alignments? I'm still more unsure about Mundi than I am Smeagol, that's a reason I'm keeping it on Smeagol rather than Mundi.
  5. Unbelievable, I didn't realise we'd seen no alignments. What a massive thing to miss!
  6. Exactly. Maybe you're pre-emptively preparing the defense for your mafia colleagues there whilst you're discussing things behind the scenes and deciding what to do? I'd say tell them to take the gamble, cast the deciding vote and take a vein of innocence from it. Personally I'm unsure, but willing to go with Esequiel on his original insistence, rather than let another night slip past and lose a good piece.
  7. Smeagol is the only realistic lead we have imo. I always find it amazing how people so quickly turn tides between days.
  8. Maybe someone who hasn't voted feels the same way and decides they think Zell is worth a vote, if that happens, then you're sorted for moving on :p You know, the fact that one deciding vote could clinch it and a number of people haven't voted yet, makes me think even more that he might actually be mafia. I'm sure they wouldn't want to cast their own deciding vote now, would they?
  9. I tend to agree, yesterday everyone was all for Smeagol, I only wished to give it another night and see if anything came up, but I don't think this Mundi thing is solid to me. I'm not even sure I understand it.
  10. Strange indeed. You're a weird one Esquiel.
  11. What is the info you've got? Or are the people it relates to aware you have it and you are asking them first?
  12. The double targeting was a big gamble to take if that's the case, though. Though having said that it was previously mentioned by someone who got refreshed, was it not? Mr-paul, I believe? I for one definitely know it's possible, and fully intend to vote for Esequiel tomorrow if Zell turns out town. It's a matter that'd HAVE to be pursued though, and we need to commit to it, I've seen many a 'he's evil lynch me tomorrow if not' gamble pay off far too well. If I get killed, I hope someone follows it up.
  13. I'm feeling more and more uncertain, I think the mafia are doing well to be among us, and I think we should watch carefully for all those on Mundi's case. I'm not changing my vote.
  14. So how many investigators have we got now then?
  15. Two townies? Who? I'm willing to go with Esequiel's insistence, with full intention to lynch him if he's wrong. We can't just wait forever and be killed.
  16. Things are feeling stale, I'll Vote:Smeagol
  17. No, if you're mafia that's even more reason for people not to, to give you that perfect defense. It is in fact, to me at least, strange that no one at all has even tried to defend you. The sensible thing WOULD be to admit it...unless you killed someone, or at least had suspicious actions. Who are you, what do you do? What if the reason was because he was mafia and he wanted to conceal it with both a regular poweruse and a kill? He woultnt deny it thne?
  18. So you have an active power that you may use of a night time, with a passive power that takes precedence if activated? Offer anything on either, or what you might have done last or previous nights? It makes me think of Ness or Lucas with their pk and shielding abilities, though I don't know how much I'd call that passive, something about them as characters does really make me think of them as more passive than anyone else, though really it should be someone with a counter.
  19. Also does nobody notice Chairdriver's silence, compared to his previous reveal? To talk for such a thing, but not then find/follow interest in the game, I find it strange. (also i've totally been watching code gheass and drinking...ZERO!) Passive? So you do nothing of a night? Or nothing actively?
  20. Something eh, what about giving us something? Anything, Cube? Quickend voters always make me suspicious.
  21. (also I'm totally taking Esequiel tomorrow if Zell's innocent)
  22. Baseless? Ha! I have first hand experience, don't dare call me baseless!
  23. Wait what, when did Zell target two people? The night Ellmeister died? Why did I think you said that was smeagol? Correction to my former post. Also, Vote:Zell.
  24. Interesting. With that, I guess I'll come forward, whether at risk of death to myself or not. Ike...is me. I targetted ReZ on night 1, but apparently my roleblock cannot be protected, if someone tries to they'll take a walloping as well. That's why ReZ's self protection probably didn't work on Night 1. I assumed there was no kill because he was the killer, and I roleblocked him, and so I targetted him on Night 2 as well. However that's why your 80% certainty bothered me, because I definitely got re-directed on Night 2 as ReZ didn't get hit. I found an item that night as well, which allowed me to target two people last night, which I did at random. This is why I also wonder about whether Smeagol recieved an item, mine stated simply that it allowed me to target two people, if that happened to a mafia could they choose a kill and a power?
  25. Oh, I thought it might have been an item or something with an uncertainty. So what would you protect from, kills or powers or just generally anybody targetting me? I'm trying to figure out if I was or not.
×
×
  • Create New...