The Peeps

I had a feeling you were holding off voting for EEVIL because of that but I'm glad you played within the spirit of the game, Rummy DuD was definitely the only townie taking action and playing well. We nearly killed DuD instead of Magnus Peterson but opted to go for the latter first. If we'd killed DuD first it would have been a much more boring game I think! It was difficult to get any real strategy going in the main thread as the town was so inactive. There was simply no reason to post. I don't think anyone asked me once for my targets or role. @ReZourceman so the only reason the kill was successful is because the mafia sent in targets first and I put the kill at the top of the list? Ridiculously lucky!

Did not expect the N bomb

Whatever the result, this has been a fun day :p

Fuck it... 1

ReZ himself said he was lying though. It's not like he's holding back secret information. If Lazy/Dedede is mafia it's purely coincidence =\

@Cube there is nothing on Mr. Lazy besides ReZ's accusation which he's already admitted to be a lie. This is not town play. Please change your vote :p

The accusation is equally pathetic. I'm not going to defend Dedede's defence (lol), but as I said before, how are you meant to defend against a blind accusation anyway? It's simply one word against another. It shouldn't be on Dedede to defend himself (even though I agree, he really should) it should be on ReZ to prove something against him.

It's the first person after DuD says the day is over. I don't think anyone is online to change their vote besides ReZ.

The smart move is to vote no lynch. You can't seriously want to lynch a player based on an admitted lie? It's literally voting for the sake of voting. It completely undermines the game.

Well that is interesting... but could just be because with no power, you can't be roleblocked.

Can you confirm this, Diageo?

Because where does it end? Lose one townie today, lose another in the night phase. Another tomorrow and the day after. Trial and error will not win the game for the town. Once the mafia see how easy this is (if it isn't mainly mafia already pushing today), they'll be doing the same. I'm inherently against this lynch because it is not fair. How do you defend yourself against a blind accusation anyway? You say he is, he says he isn't. I am not in favour of voting randomly and seeing what sticks. I like to be methodical, I like to have an actual reason to vote. Perhaps this lynch is so difficult (I still maintain that it isn't and looks sure to happen) because it's based on an admitted lie. I am equally blind as to why you are so inherently FOR this lynch when you know yourself there is absolutely no basis for it. Innocent until proven guilty in my eyes :p call me naive

You've only just seen that post? Really dude? :p You made things active sure, but you've outed a protector and started a lynch against someone who may be completely innocent. Congrats. It's 50/50 on whether we lose a protector or an investigator tonight. Since you said you got squat, one person has removed their vote and one person has added. So please tell me, how is this a difficult lynch?

Actually that's completely true. We all followed your claim at first but then your lie started to unwind when we found out Mr. Lazy had been protected and it was only after you admitted to lying that some people came off the Lazy lynch. I seriously suspect ulterior motives here. People are voting based on an admitted lie for no reason other than 'gotta do something'. How about use your brains and work things out instead of voting randomly. What if ReZ had picked one of you to lie about instead? He's picked someone inactive purely because they won't defend themselves. Dare I say it is a classic mafia tactic :p

If you think I'm the one with a thirst for blood you're clearly still not paying attention. When I brought your name up I was merely being facetious.

What a joke. So you're still going to vote for people based on randomness and even when faced with someone lying about another player for no reason, you're not going to vote for them purely because they were trying to get a lynch done? That seems crazy to me. I'm all for lynching people but I'd like there to be at least a speck of reasoning. Next phase I will be voting for you or ReZ. The only reason I'm not doing so now is to save someone who has nothing against them yet might be lynched anyway. Sure, he may end up being mafia in the end - I have no proof he isn't... but the town won't win by trial and error. How many townies will be lynched before we hit a mafia through dumb luck and chance? It's a terrible way for town to play and I don't agree with it.

@Yvonne ok how about ReZ as a better target? He basically made the whole thing up to get someone lynched and only came clean when I said he might be neutral. I'd switch my vote to him but that would put Mr. Lazy back in majority and there's nothing on him except that he's been less active than others. If you want to lynch inactive people, why not go for Diageo? He forgot this game even existed. You seem strangely lynch heavy this game. Just because it's most votes doesn't mean people have to die every day. You were all for a completely random lynch on day 1 which would've resulted in a now confirmed townie (me) being killed. Way to appear innocent. Vote for ReZ or yourself if you're not going to vote no lynch.

How about the info that ReZ made the whole thing up? =\

Let's get some votes removed now then please. @Yvonne @Diageo @Magnus Peterson @Sheikah @Cube

If that's all it took, this would be an easy game for mafia to win :p You can't just say 'trust me I am sure' without giving us some kind of hint as to why. I don't like to place my vote with no information. You could be neutral and you have to get someone lynched to fulfil your win condition. Just one example of 'what's the worst that could happen'.

That would fit but I'd like to hear it from ReZ

It's not that I'm suspicious of rez, I just don't trust that a tracker could find someone as mafia. ReZ hasn't even said who mr lazy targeted has he? Even if he targeted clumsy, it is not proof of mafia.

Well eevil allegedly didn't even send a target last night. He's a roleblocker and so is Drahkon. He could easily have killed last night. He's got ghe same role as two other townies (assuming drahkon is town). We need to know who drahkon blocked too to confirm his action as so far no one has claimed to be blocked. I think EEVIL is the only way to go at this point tbh.

Vote: No lynch Not sure how a tracker can get definite info of someone being mafia - even if they did target the kidnapped Mr and especially if said Mr was apparently protected? Needs investigating imo.

Dedede said that Sheikah is a roleblocker... which I assume is actually EEVIL's role then? So that should be two people that were roleblocked last night.