Sprout

You're breakin' my heart, pal! Plus I figured what with you bein' the ace attorney you'd have figured it out on your own by now. But fine, ol' Dick Gumshoe is gonna explain it to ya, pal! I can copy abilities with the "Hey Pal" bubble. I used it on Cube in Session 2, so I gained his ability for Break 2 (which you can gather from what he said is that he can find out who targeted his target). I targeted Sméagol, and found out that DuD and Diageo targeted him. Is that all you needed, pal?

Pal, you really need to work on your numbers, and that's comin' from me of all people. (You forgot MadDog's vote.) Sorry, pal, I completely forgot to reply to you. I'm not sure if I should reveal my powers just yet, but I intend to reveal them by the next session for sure. That is, if I don't get kicked out in the next break, haha! I have no real reason to doubt my evidence though, and to be honest I'm fine gettin' rid of either of 'em as they're both suspicious to me. If we're wrong today, we'll just get the other one! But I'm going with Diageo for now as he contradicted my information whereas DuD did not. I will say that in addition to the info I shared, that I also heard a voice, which may have been you?

There's a difference here, pals. One of you was "unsuccessful". The other was redirected. Why would two people who targeted the same person have different outcomes?

The info I have is that both DuD and Diageo targeted Sméagol. Unless we have a undetectable person in our midst, then at least one of these is definitely a thief, pal. I see no reason why I'd have only partially tampered evidence either.

I still think you're suspicious... but I'll give you credit, at least you were honest about your target, pal. Which is more than I can say for... According to my info, during the last break, you targeted Sméagol, pal! Vote: Diageo

Now, maybe I have it wrong, pal, but the problem with that theory of yours for break 2 (the thieves making you untargetable to somehow frame you) is that the thieves would have to know that you would target who they were gonna incriminate for it to work. You could have targeted anyone, and that plan would have fallen apart, right? How do you explain that, pal? Double Post: We also haven't heard from @Dedede, @Diageo and @jayseven in this session yet, so it would be nice to hear what you've got up to last break, pals. We kinda know what Dedede did, but he still has some questions to ask.

... What kind of juice is that, pal?! That said, I'd also like to know why @Dedede would target Rummy. Assuming he's a roleblocker based on what Rummy has said, wouldn't it be more logical to go after DuD to potentially prevent someone else from bein' implicated? And speaking of which, what were you up to, @DuD? Don't think you can avoid bein' asked questions after what the Oldbag saw previously, pal! You're still arguably the most suspect!

Well, yeah, of course it's going to be different from the last game, pal. If all the characters were exactly the same as before, alignments an' all, then the only innocent ones would be new characters, and that'd just leave Cube and Rummy at this point! With that said, we barely know the abilities of any players at this moment. Just as it would be unwise to assume that certain characters have the exact same ability, we also can't just assume that all characters from the previous have completely new abilities. It's a blank slate, anybody could have any ability at this point. That said, however unlikely or lazy you may think it is, you can't deny the possibility that some characters may have at least some of their abilities intact from the previous game (and I don't think you should accuse Jonnas of lazy writing if this ends up being the case, that guy puts a lot of effort in these games regardless). And if this possibility exists, the possibility for people to assume that some players may think that this is the case also exists. This discussion about the possibility of recurring player abilities and player's assumptions on them doesn't really matter though if it's not giving us anything solid to work with (though I thank you for challenging the theory). Unless somebody knew who gave me the note then there's no way for the note to be linked to anybody. I just wanted to bring the note to light and ask why someone would send it to me. So far, all we have is a collective shrug, pal! =P --- I'm not sure there's really anything solid enough at the moment to start casting votes over unfortunately. The "strongest" thing we have so far is arguably the stuff about DuD in the write-up, but as he's declined to comment further than he has (and nobody seems to want to challenge him on this at the moment), we seem to be at a bit of a dead end right now, pals! Unless anybody has anything new to bring to to the discussion, that is. Or just pile the pressure on somebody, heh.

Well, they could assume I'm an investigator because: I'm Detective Dick Gumshoe I was an investigator in the last Ace Attorney game (and, uh, I was kinda pretty good, pal. I got no increase in salary for my efforts, though...) I think both are pretty good reasons why they would assume that. I admit that my theory about the note being some elaborate ploy to implicate someone that failed isn't concrete, but seriously, if you have any idea why somebody would give me this note, then I am open to ideas. What reason would a thief have to send me a note demanding me to give them some court records that I don't have. Even if I did, it is as you say - I would have no idea who to give them to, because the note has nothing to say about how to hand them over! It makes no sense, so I've been trying to figure out why anybody would send me such a note. I mean, another theory I guess is that perhaps there is someone in the game who is trying to find somebody who does have those documents. But the note says it's written by the thieves... urgh, my head hurts, pal.

Uhhh, I guess I'll explain it again, pal. I didn't target anybody last break. I got a PM with a note (to be more specific, I found it in my pocket). This means that somebody targeted me and gave me that note. The note said that it was written by the thieves and that they needed court records from the last trial (I'm assuming "the last trial" means Ace Attorney: The Turnabout Mafia). I really doubt that an innocent person would write a note like this, so unless there's a neutral causing mischief, why would the thief send a note, pal? And why would a thief send a note to me specifically? My theory is that the thieves think I'm an investigator, and would target somebody to find out their alignment. As such, they gave me this note with the intention that I would assume that this note was written by whoever I targeted, leading me to accuse them of being a thief. Unfortunately for the thieves, I failed to send a target in the last break, so now it just looks like someone simply put a note into my pocket instead of implicating anybody. Is that easier to understand? If you have any idea why someone would send me a note though, I'm all ears, pal.

(Just ignore the pal infringement, Gumshoe, they're all just kickin' you whilst you're down!) I revealed the note in the hopes that others may have received something similar, sir, but not many people have spoken up since. I see no reason why an innocent person would write this note, but the thought of a thief sending this... it just seems stupid! ...But I think I've figured it out. The thieves could have sent a note to anyone, but they chose to send it to me specifically. Why? Because of the last trial, pals... They probably wanted me to investigate somebody and find this note, leading me to accusing somebody as the thief, and when they were revealed innocent after being voted on, leave my reputation as an investigator in question (note that I'm not claiming I'm an investigator (I'll never say no to protection though, haha), this is just me thinking what the thieves assume I am based on the last trial). Unfortunately for the thieves, I never sent in a target last break, so this plan of theirs fell apart. I can make a lousy reputation for myself without anybody's help! In conclusion... this note is probably a forgery, pals. The thieves can likely forge evidence, just like they could in the last trial. Whether it's something all of the thieves can do or just one is something we don't yet know. Though this doesn't necessarily bring us closer to implicating anyone, I think it's safe to assume that a thief targeted me last break!

Hm... Right, it's premature, but here's my current, um... what's it called? Lo...gic? Audio The game started with 14 players: Cube Dannyboy-the-Dane Dedede Diageo DuD jayseven MadDog Marcamillian Mr-Paul Rummy Sheikah Sméagol Sprout The Peeps This is purely guesswork, but with 14 players, I'd say we'd have, at most, four people colluding as our thieves, pals. It's just a case of figurin' out who they are. The thieves could be anyone, but we can at least try to narrow down who graped Miss Cykes belongings... We can take Mr-Paul off the list of course. Next up... I'd argue that Mr. Edgeworth (The Peeps) has better things to do than go sneaking around during the breaks, and the thieves would probably use somebody with no break power to do the incriminating (if they have such a member that is). Anyway, the Oldbag (Sheikah) watched him drinkin' tea at the time Miss Cykes got graped, so that counts him out. Oldbag herself couldn't do it either, as she was too busy watching DuD. I didn't do anything as I was too busy trying on jackets, but I was targeted by the thieves if the note I got is to be believed. MadDog claims he targeted Sheikah, revealing some info (that Sheikah hasn't clarified). Diageo got roleblocked by somebody who hasn't come forward. Cube Dannyboy-the-Dane Dedede DuD jayseven Marcamillian Rummy Sméagol Currently, that leaves 8 potential suspects for the incrimination of Mr-Paul (the roleblocker who got Diageo is also likely amongst these suspects). All Dannyboy-the-Dane has done is ask a question. The same goes for jayseven, and neither have responded to those who answered them. Both Rummy and jayseven may have something on Dedede. Dedede has nothing to report. Both Cube and Marcamillian claim they successfully reached their target (Cube elaborating that nothing happened as a result of his successful target). Sméagol claims his break was uneventful. And finally we have DuD who we know targeted Mr-Paul. As far as I know, nobody so far is able to back up anybody's claims on, well, anything! ...It's all still pretty vague so far, pals (feel free to correct me on anything).It may only be the second session, but that shouldn't stop people from talking/asking questions and being more forthcoming with the info they have if they have any. A game of silence is never a good one for the side of the innocent, pals!

E...everyone is stealing my character traaaiiit... I... I thought I was on to somethiiiiing... Audio Would it be ok to ask for more information on this, sir? The way I interpret it, you successfully reached your target, but nothing happened? Or was your action unsuccessful (meaning you possibly didn't reach your target?)

I have one way to find out for sure I guess! Change Vote: Sméagol (I mean, the original vote was this anyway but I suppose I'll make it more "official". Also, you were probably gonna whip me anyway... *flinch*)

You can't just go saying "pal" like that! That's MY endearing char...act...uhhh... A-actually, you can say "pal" all you like, sir! I, uh, like the look! Don't pick on Mr. Edgeworth! All he did during the break was drink tea! He didn't do anything, paaaaaa- -aaaahhhhh please don't whip me, siiiiirrrrrr! ...Wait, actually, there's something wrong here. See, the initial numbers for the opening write-up were off by one, and have been ever since. Furthermore, you haven't appeared in the list of players since the first write-up. I think that's worth looking into! On that basis, Vote: Sssss- -sssssprooooouuuuut!

Sorry for not posting yesterday. I didn't do anything last break, but I did get a note, pals. Apparently it's from the thieves (plural), and they want ("need" is the actual word used in the note if that affects your interpretation of it) the last trial's court records... Not really sure what to make of it, to be honest. Someone... has the power to write notes? The thieves... think that grape juice is a hostage that will get the police to hand somethin' important over? Whoever wrote this message, I don't think they thought it through, pals. Especially if they thought that the guy in pyjamas could carry out their demands.

You must have JavaScript enabled on your device to view Miiverse posts that have been embedded in a website. View post in Miiverse Of all the drawings I did back when I doodled on Miiverse, this is the one that got the most "Yeahs" by a pretty wide margin. Pics with Mario, Link and other big faces you associate with Nintendo don't even come close. It's just another example, along with all the tearjerking tributes that have flooded in since the tragic news broke, that speaks volumes about just how many lives this incredibly likable man has connected to and helped bring joy to with his many contributions. It's strange... Usually I can ramble on and on fairly easily, but today my hands feel heavy, and words are failing me. Though my hands may find the task too difficult, it seems that my eyes have managed to share my thoughts and feelings today with much greater ease. Perhaps that says enough. Maybe in time I can do better, but for now all I'm able to type is... thank you. Thank you for the fun over the years and for bringing smiles to so many people. May you rest peacefully, Mr. Iwata. Audio Sorry, I don't have access to any of my drawing stuff, but I wanted to do something, so... Anyway, maybe I can do more than an MSPaint sprite recolour one day.

Jonnas, pal, we need to talk for a moment. See, when I was told there would be a party the first thing that popped into my mind was a slumber party. Now maybe I should have stopped there and thought of somethin' more sensible, but then I pictured the Judge dressed in a onesie whilst havin' pillow fights and I just couldn't get it out of my head. So now here I am in a trench coat and pyjamas feelin' pretty underdressed, pal! I mean, with my salary I'd be underdressed regardless, but at least I'd have a tie! Vote: Jonnas for not being clearer on the type of party this would be from the start, even if he's not actually a character.

I don't have many custom fighters with equipment on, so aside from maybe the Mii Fighters, any Vampire Badges were sheer coincidence from the random setting. Not that it helped any, since fluctuating launch rates effectively made recovery a moot point. Anyway, it was fun. Also, either K.K.Slider is performing outside of Saturdays, or somebody needs to change his Wii U's Date and Time settings. =P To be honest I find when the launch rate is low and matches take forever it's kinda boring, but maybe that's just me.

I assumed that DCubed would be with you, but I guess I was wrong. I'll join if you need the numbers (gotta hunt me a monster), but if anybody reading wants to join and finds that the room is full, just mention me and I'll be happy to drop out.

I appreciate you making an attempt to host and hope that others follow your example, but that time on Thursdays clashes with the MK League. You're not even gonna hook in RedShell with that time, heh. If you're intent on doing it tonight, maybe consider changing the time to either 7PM or 9PM. ...Maybe? Personally though I think I'd prefer to see another stage from you that, y'know, works. =P

It was nice to see you again, f00. Don't be a stranger, yeah? We could always use more players, heh. Good games today! Glad to see you enjoyed yourself tonight, @Aneres11. Things got a bit hectic, but, uh, that's just how Smash can be. Hopefully we'll have more matches in the future! @RedShell, you're never gonna give up on that baby face, are ya.

Currently items are on. Shouldn't matter too much, right? If it does, well, you'll have to beat me to change my settings. =P

To those interested (probably nobody =P) I've got a room open right now with Aneres, so come on in if you'd like to play!