Menkor

The GC version of at least RE2 is slightly sharper and I also think that it ran smoother...Have not played the GC version of RE3 yet, but it is waiting on my shelf...Just got them both RE2 and RE3 are worth buying even though they are ports, but not for full price...RE2 still looks pretty good today and it was a blast playing through it...Very interesting knowing the background of the events in RE4(Ada etc) The controls were also easy coming into, even though they had taken away the quick-turn One question though...Code Veronica, is it 2 discs where you can save before changing the disc? I mean, it comes change disc on screen and then let me save? I am playing everything on my Wii right now, and my Wii cannot play multi-disc GC games if I cannot save, pop in the game, and then load the file from disc 2 and continue from there...If I pop in a game without that option, it just stands "an error has occured"

Yeah, Wind Waker was a good game AND the graphics were beautiful...Nothing wrong with cel-shaded, it was just that the ones who grew up with the overrated OoT never had imagined that Zelda had that style to it too... I am not positive about motion+ either, it just feels like they are going to "force" us in getting it along with the other hundreds of accessories...Really, would anyone be surprised if Zelda Wii needed motion+ to be played?

Can anyone clarify this for me? Is this going to be a "real" router or more along the lines as the Nintendo Wi-fi USB connector?

TP was really good, but no game can stand up to the greatness of A link to the past I feel that the next Zelda MUST have voice-acting, it could be kind of the same that Metroid Prime 3 used...

This game has really grown alot for me...At first, I thought it was going to be a half-assed cash-in but it seems as if it actually shapes up to be a good game

Lets see if I got this right...People are very happy with the Wii edition of RE4, and it only had added motion controls and the extras from the PS2 version... Now suddenly, when there is a rumour about a remake of RE2, people scream and are saying that it is a quick-cash in by Capcom, but they were still extremely pleased with RE4 Wii edition... Can anyone tell me what I have missed?

Heck yeah, this is what I have asked for the whole last year...I was very disappointed that REmake was the only game getting the graphical overhaul(well RE0 was not a remake) while the other games were simply ported over in their current state I even asked for this on the DS since RE:DS Even if the graphics were not pre-rendered, the Wii should very well be able to make it a good-looking title

Load of bullcrap? Actually not Before you tell me how much RE4 was able to handle, can you tell me exactly how many we SAW it handling? And the Wii is not "so much more powerful" than the gamecube...It is more powerful, but it is not THAT much more powerful If we shall go by reality and take the games that have been praised for their graphics on the Wii(MP3 and SMG), were there really any big differences between MP3 and MP2? I take MP2 vs MP3 because it was towards the end of the GC's lifespan Sure, MP3 looked better(still not THAT much better) and had bigger areas than MP2... But if you claim that it can do RE4 quality 100 enemies on screen, feel free to sign up at Capcom and show them your expertise...If you are as good as you give the impression to be, you will surely be taken as a hero There WILL be more than 12 enemies on screen...We never know if it indeed makes it to 100 before it is released, but the game will have far more enemies than 12 on screen...Downgrades in graphics were made for more enemies and such

Do you want to know why Dead Rising really looks worse than RE4? Because Dead Rising will have a lot more zombies on screen(aiming for 100) and much wider areas...How many enemies did RE4 have on screen? 10? Really, there is no comparison there...More enemies take up more horsepower, same case with wider areas And on top of that, they are porting a 360 game to the Wii, and people had doubts about them even being able to port RE4 over to the PS2!

But would you still not prefer to see a whole new RE in the same vein as RE4, built exclusively to the Wii instead of a very downgraded version of RE5? The graphics ARE very improved, with much more expansive areas...Even if graphics were cut down to RE4 class, they would still have to cut the size of the environments...Enemies too would get cut down in numbers Not to mention the physics in form of chainsaws cutting through the walls and such... The PS2 version was brought down in both visuals and numbers of enemies, and it was MUCH closer to the power of the GC than what the Wii is to PS3/360...This game is simply out of range for the Wii

Do you really want to see a very downgraded version of RE5 on the Wii? I rather want them to make a brand new RE for the Wii instead, but in the same vein as RE4 I would not say no to REmake2 either

No, remakes and ports are the only games the wii is getting right now... Let them make a new Zelda game instead Besides, we got Alttp on the VC, which is the best game EVAH! What more can you ask for

The RGB-cables are really expensive for both the Wii and the Xbox 360, is it really worth it? Will the visuals become better, or are RGB just "over-hyped" for SDTV users? Do you have that cable yourself and have you been able to compare it to the official one? I just found it within the country, but am unsure about how good it is

I just remembered one thing and I want to clarify that... Is it true that 3rd party products void your warranty? I am not so worried about the Wii, since every Nintendo product I have had has had the LEAST problems...The famous RROD for the Xbox 360 is another story though, so I guess that I will not go for 3rd party if it voids my warranty there

Yep, CRT TV...No 480p support either^^ Sadly, every online shop within the country seems to only have Madcatz and some has Joytech, and very expensive Monster cables

Does anyone know how well 3rd party RGB cables compare to the official Nintendo ones? For example, Madcatz has very cheap cables compared to Nintendo's, and I find it hard to believe that it is easy to **** up a cable as easily as controllers This may be the wrong forum to ask, but since I also have a xbox 360, does anyone have any experience of RGB cables on that system too? Supposedly Madcatz, because it seems as if Madcatz are the only 3rd party avaible directly in stores

If there is a chance of saving much money, I take it

Can anyone confirm if NTSC MP3 and SMG works on PAL Wii? The Wii has never been updated with newer firmware, if that matters

Nope, it is fact The only reason why the zombies were still stupid in REmake was because it was a remake...And we have seen that the enemies in RE4 were much smarter than them Sure, it will not look like PS1 graphics, but it will be as big as the difference between REmake and RE1 Then you can add in smaller areas and worse physics

I have both a Wii and a DS and I need to connect them to the internet...I do not have a wireless setup and I do not have a "normal" router either, so the LAN adapter is of no use for me... I know that there are problems with the Nintendo USB-connector regarding different firewalls(Zonealarm mostly) and that it also works on XP only... Does anyone know if Datel's device works any better? Does it work with eg Zonealarm and does it support more than just XP?

Is there no other way? I just cannot change my whole network setup and I really want to take the Wii online

My thoughts exactly...We are not talking differences between the PS2 and GC version of RE4, we are talking differences comparable to REmake vs RE1 on the PS1(but not a remake this time and therefore the differences will be even more apparent)

Areas would have to been cutout/smaller, physics would be far worse, AI would be far worse, amount of enemies on screen would be far worse, important effects would be missing etc We do not just talk downgrades in visuals when it comes from 360/PS3 to Wii, we talk about major changes to the gameplay itself if such a demanding game shall be made on such a weak hardware

I can't say that I am impressed by the graphics...But I really do appreciate that there still are developers that actually care about the framerate 60 FPS with these graphics will do just fine, rather than something that tries to challenge the 360 version of CoD 3 and has a terrible framerate

And Nintendo let them start coding on a GC, what's the difference? Developers have got years of experience with GC and Wii and the GC is in fact almost identical in architecture They had the exact same advantage like Microsoft