Kounan

That's a big difference....

Lego: JW is there a mistake with the UK price?

Do they mean more RAM? If yes, should that not mean more powerful console?

I would keep inkstrike and I would prefer bomb instead of ink mine.

I am spending money on new gear and am trying to fill it up. But it does affect my results.

I am using Rakuten/Base to order games now, as at the end it's cheaper, because I don't have to pay tax if it's under 25 euros. Rakuten/Base give sometimes free points, like few day ago (500) which is worth 5 pounds so with that the game was less then 9 pounds at the and . I will try the same deal with Deux Ex, unless there is some big sale on eshop.

No I haven't, but it has to be on sale for me to buy it , as "big" money I am prepared only to sell on Nintendo IP's because I don't have many as I've bought the console not that long ago .

Can't it stay cheap, but be more powerful than the Wii U because it should be cheaper to make now? On top of that take the game pad out (which I love, but most people obviously don't and I do understand them as at the begging I was not sure what they are advertising) and it should bring the price down, or keep it the same, but allow them to make the machine more powerful. That should be enough to play current gen games, even if it's less powerful compared to PS4 and XBONE as these consoles aren't used to their full potential. I do agree with Ronnie why people buy Nintendo consoles and that's why they need more of their own IP's in other genres (buy some studios) to make Nintendo fans happy and in the same time to raise interest on the other side, while games like Zelda, Metroid and Splatoon have to be ready on launch or soon after (Mario, Mario Kart, Smash and similar titles will be ready).

Have to try it, but it could be a problem if it doesn't kill quickli.

I'hope I am going to like it , but first let's hope the shipment has no problems .

As I've said before, I don't agree and I've stated why, but I'll accept your opinion and for now our opinions are not going to change (I would like VC for other reasons, but has not to do much with playing the regular battles). : peace:: peace:

These are little things that don't do much in regular battles. Who ever played with me tonight could see how many points I managed to get (only time I got a bit less was when I had connection problems and I had to look after my daughter all the times, as she was sleeping on the couch and there was danger of falling down, while I don't play that much - almost all of you are higher levels compared to me - and I am not that good actually as I am almost at the bottom when it comes to kills as I am not used to these kind of controls for shooters) because I've chosen another approach which brings more points to me and my team. The things you have mentioned have nothing to with tactics. It's nice to help someone that way, but this game in regular mode shouldn't be played with people grouping together, as the point is to color as much ground as possible. Kills don't count. So to win you should spread as much as possible and cover everything that is not covered and in these situations you can't see what's going on, unless you look at the pad and then if you have some good special weapon you can use it to help your teammates. As I said I am not against VC at all, it can help a bit, but in my opinion it's not important at all to win the game (it doesn't matter how good you and your friend work together if I go on the other side of the map and am collecting points for my team, you just have to split up). Also, the VC would be fun if it's only switch on between friends. Ranked battles are the ones were VC should be a must and I don't have to explain why.

After playing this game for a "few" days and after improving a bit, I have to say that I think that voice chat wouldn't be of any use in regular battles, or not any real use. Just to make clear, I am not against it as people can chat, I can switch it off and it could maybe help in some situations, but these situations can be handled without it. Now to explain my opinion. This game is to fast, to short and to dynamic to be able to make any tactics with your team. Everything you decide at certain point can make no sense in few seconds if someone uses ink strike and kills some of your team members and takes that territory, as you have to take it back. Because of the dynamics you have to make choices dependent on the situation, but because the games are short you can't discuss it, you just have to do follow your plan and trying to help your team during that period. Also, people can have score points without having to fight anyone. Teams can't make tactics in which they would have someone to protect certain territory as firstly he can be killed with the special weapon, but what is more important you loose one man/woman where you can't really compensate for it. As I said, it is just to fast and tactics have to be made individually and have to be executed promptly, otherwise it becomes to late and you have to make another one. When it comes to ranked battles it's different there, as the goal is different and chat would actually help a lot. Btw. the only thing which make me a bit upset is how some people use ink strike.... Actually, you have to say they misuse it.

Thx 2 u 2, I've ordered it already, I had only about an hour to do it to use the free points .

Actually, I would not have problems with unlocking abilities (I don't have a big problem with levels as long as you can finish the game without them, but abilities don't bother me at all).

Thank you, I've ordered it, even if I didn't fancy it, but have to try it as people do seem to like it . Was 8,58 pound (shipment included in the price ).

Thx a lot .

Should I get Batman Arkham City: Armored Edition, Batman Arkham Origins, Call of Duty Ghost, or Call of Duty Black Ops?

OK, so it's not like the one has DLC included and the other doesn't, but it's the same game.... Which one is better?

I know it's not the same game, but can someone tell me what is the difference between Batman Arkham Origins and Batman Arkham City: Armored Edition? It would be nice if someone could answer quickly, so I can use my Rakuten points. Thx.

Maybe they don't like.... I agree with you that they don't do enough when it comes to advertising, but Devils Third doesn't look like a game Nintendo officials would love to much. But God knows what's their reason.

When it comes to Yoshi, I just think that they know that it will sell well, especially with the amiibo, so they are not trying to advertise it, but they are happy with the numbers they will get anyway (I think that they could increase it with more advertising, but.....). I don't know why they are not doing it with Devils Third, but maybe it's to violent for them and they don't want to advertise it a lot.

I don't care, if it's traditional console I will buy it if I can as they have the games I love. Btw. ma FIFA 13 arrived today . Has nice things on the pad, just you need time to get used to it. Should I get Batman Arkham City: Armored Edition, Batman Arkham Origins, Call of Duty Ghost, or Call of Duty Black Ops?

Thx Rummy, will try to play it .

What is Splatfest ?